Extension of generalized topological spaces via stacks (Q343236)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Extension of generalized topological spaces via stacks
scientific article

    Statements

    Extension of generalized topological spaces via stacks (English)
    0 references
    25 November 2016
    0 references
    For any \(A\subseteq X\), \(c_{\mu}(A)\) is defined as \(\{x\in X:\) for each \(U\in \mu(x)\) we have \(U\cap A\neq\phi\}\), where \(\mu(x)\) is defined as the set of all \(\mu\)-open sets containing an element \(x\in X\). In a GTS \((X,\mu)\), if \(c_\mu(\phi)\neq \phi\), then each point of \(c_\mu(\phi)\) is called an abandoned point of \(X\). For each non-abandoned \(x\in X\), \(\mathcal{S}(x)\) denotes the collection \(\{A\subseteq X: x\in c_\mu(A) \}\); it is shown that \(\mathcal{S}(x)\) is a stack. The author defines different types of stacks, as follows: a stack \(\mathcal{S}\) on a GTS is called a (i) closure stack (c-stack, in short) if \(c_\mu(A)\in\mathcal{S}\Rightarrow A\in \mathcal{S}\) for each \(A\subseteq X\); (ii) fixed point stack (fp-stack, in short) if \(\mathcal{S}=\mathcal{S}(x)=\{A\subseteq X: x\in c_\mu (A) \}\), for some \(x\in X\); (iii) neighbourhood stack (nbd-stack in short), if \(\mathcal{S}=\mu\)-neighbourhood system at \(x\), for some \(x\in X\). If, in a GTS, there is no abandoned point, then the GTS is called strong. It is shown that for a \(T_0\) GTS \((X,\mu)\) and \(X^*\) the collection of all c-stacks on \(X\), with the strong GT \(\sigma\) given by the generalized closure operator \(c_\sigma:\mathcal{P}(X^*)\longrightarrow \mathcal{P}(X^*)\), described as \(c_\sigma(\alpha)=\cap\{A^c: \alpha\subseteq A^c, A\subseteq X\}\), \((X^*,\sigma)\) is an extension of \((X,\mu)\) via the map \(\psi: (X,\mu)\longrightarrow (X^*,\sigma)\) given by \(\psi(x)=\mathcal{S}(x)\). The concept of \(\mu\)-compactness is defined for a GTS \((X,\mu)\) in the natural fashion. Defining conjoint stacks, it is shown that a GTS \((X,\mu)\) is \(\mu\)-compact iff every conjoint stack \(\mu\)-adheres in \(X\) where \(\mu\)-adherence of a stack \(\mathcal{S}\) at some \(x\) happens when \(\mathcal{S}\subseteq \mathcal{S}(x)\). A grill \(\mathcal{S}\) on a GTS \((X,\mu)\) is called linked if, for any pair \(A,B\in \mathcal{S}\), \(c_\mu(A)\cap c_\mu(B)\neq \phi\); a GTS \((X,\mu)\) is called generalized linkage compact, if every linked grill \(\mu\)-adheres in \(X\). A \(\mu\)-regular \(\mu\)-compact GTS is shown to be generalized linkage compact. It is also shown that an extension \((X^*,\sigma)\) of a \(T_0\) GTS \((X,\mu)\) via the injective map \(\phi: X\longrightarrow X^*\), \((X^*, \sigma)\) is \(\mu\)-compact iff \(X^*\) (which contains all fp-stacks), is a finitely determined collection of c-stacks on \(X\).
    0 references
    0 references
    \(fp\)-stack
    0 references
    \(c\)-stack
    0 references
    extension of GTS
    0 references
    principal extension
    0 references
    \(\mu\)-compact extension
    0 references
    generalized linkage compact
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references