Note on new general integral operators of \(p\)-valent functions (Q351252)

Let \(\mathcal A_{p}\) denote the class of functions of the form \[ \displaystyle{f(z)=z^{p} + \sum^{\infty}_{j=p+1} a_{j}z^{j},\quad a_{j} \geq 0,\quad p \in \{1,2, ...\},\quad z \in U}, \] or \[ \displaystyle{f(z)=z^{p} - \sum^{\infty}_{j=p+1} a_{j}z^{j}, \quad a_{j} \geq 0,\quad p \in \{1,2, ...\},\quad z \in U}, \] which are analytic in the open unit disk \(U=\{z:|z|<1 \}\), and let \(\mathcal A=\mathcal A_{1}\). A function \(f\in \mathcal A_{p}\) is said to be \(p\)-valent starlike of order \(\beta\) (\(0 \leq \beta<p\)) iff \[ \displaystyle{\mathrm{Re} \left( \frac{zf^{\prime}(z)}{f(z)}\right)> \beta \quad (z \in U)}. \] We denote by \(\mathcal S^{\star}_{p}(\beta)\) the class of all functions from \(\mathcal A_{p}\) which satisfy the condition above. On the other hand, a function \(f \in\mathcal A_{p}\) is said to be \(p\)-valent convex of order \(\beta\) (\(0 \leq \beta<p\)) if and only if \[ \displaystyle{\mathrm{Re} \left(1+ \frac{zf^{\prime \prime}(z)}{f^{\prime}(z)}\right)> \beta \quad (z \in U)}. \] Let \(\mathcal K_{p}(\beta)\) be the class of all \(p\)-valent convex functions of order \(\beta\) in \(U\). Furthermore, a function \(f(z)\in\mathcal A_{p}\) is said to be in the class \(\mathcal C_{p}(\beta)\) of \(p\)-valent close-to-convex functions of order \(\beta\) (\(0 \leq \beta<p\)) in \(U\) iff \[ \displaystyle{\mathrm{Re} \left( \frac{f^{\prime}(z)}{z^{p-1}}\right)> \beta \quad (z \in U)}. \] A function \(f \in\mathcal A_{p}\) is said to be in the class \(\mathcal U\mathcal C_{p}(\beta)\) of \(p\)-valent uniformly close-to-convex functions of order \(\beta\) (\(0 \leq \beta<p\)) in \(U\) iff \[ \displaystyle{\mathrm{Re} \left(\frac{zf^{\prime}(z)}{g(z)}-\beta \right) \geq \left|\frac{zf^{\prime}(z)}{g(z)}-p \right| \quad (z \in U)}, \] for some \(g(z)\in \mathcal U\mathcal S_{p}(\beta)\), where \(\mathcal U\mathcal S_{p}(\beta)\) is the class of \(p\)-valent uniformly starlike functions of order \(\beta\), \(-1 \leq \beta <p\), in \(U\) that satisfy \[ \displaystyle{\mathrm{Re} \left(\frac{zf^{\prime}(z)}{f(z)}-\beta \right) \geq \left|\frac{zf^{\prime}(z)}{f(z)}-p \right| \quad (z \in U)}. \] Definition [\textit{M. Acu} and \textit{S. Owa}, Int. J. Comput. Math. Appl. 1, No. 1, 1--10 (2007; Zbl 1165.30303)]: Let \(\beta\), \(\lambda \in \mathbb R\), \(\beta \geq 0\), \(\lambda \geq 0\) and \(\displaystyle{f(z)=z+\sum^{\infty}_{j=2}a_{j}z^{j}}\). We denote by \(D^{\beta}_{\lambda}f(z)\) the linear operator defined by \[ \displaystyle{D^{\beta}_{\lambda}:\mathcal A\to\mathcal A, \quad D^{\beta}_{\lambda}f(z)=z+\sum^{\infty}_{j=n+1}[1+(j-1)\lambda]^{\beta}a_{j}z^{j}}. \] In a previous study, the authors considered the following operator acting on functions \(f\in \mathcal S\), \(\mathcal S=\{f\in A:f\text{ is univalent in } U\}\): \[ \displaystyle{D^{n, \beta}_{\lambda_{1}, \lambda_{2}}f(z)=(h* \psi_{1}*f)(z)= z \pm \sum_{k\geq 2} \frac{[1-\lambda_{1}(k-1)]^{\beta-1}} {[1-\lambda_{2}(k-1)]^{\beta}} \cdot \frac{1+c}{k+c} \cdot C(n,k) \cdot a_{k} \cdot z^{k}}, \] where \(\displaystyle{C(n,k)=\frac{(n+1)_{k-1}}{(1)_{k-1}}}\), \( (n)_{k}\) is the Pochammer symbol, \(k \geq 2\), \(c\geq 0\) and \(\mathrm{Re} \{c\} \geq 0\), \( z \in U\). Also, they considered the following integral operators: \[ I^{1}_{p}(z)= \left\{\beta \int^{z}_{0} pt^{p-1} \cdot \prod^{m}_{j=1} \left[ \frac{(D^{n,k}_{\lambda_{1}\lambda_{2}}f_{j}(t^{n})^{\prime})^{2_{\gamma 1}-1}}{t^{p}} \right]^{\delta^{1}_{j}} \cdot \left[ \frac{(D^{n,k}_{\lambda_{1}\lambda_{2}}f_{j}(t^{n}))^{2_{\gamma 2}-1}}{t^{p}} \right]^{\delta^{2}_{j}} dt \right\}^{\frac{1}{\beta}} \] and \[ \displaystyle{I^{2}_{p}(z)= \left\{\chi \int^{z}_{0} pt^{p-1} \cdot \prod^{m}_{j=1} \left[ \frac{(D^{\beta}_{\lambda}f_{j}(t^{n})^{\prime})^{2_{\gamma 1}-1}}{t^{p}} \right]^{\delta^{1}_{j}} \cdot \left[ \frac{(D^{\beta}_{\lambda}f_{j}(t^{n}))^{2_{\gamma 2}-1}}{t^{p}} \right]^{\delta^{2}_{j}} dt \right\}^{\frac{1}{\chi}}}. \] In this paper, the authors consider the following operators: \[ \displaystyle{I^{3}_{p}(z)= \left\{\beta \int^{z}_{0} pt^{p-1} \cdot \prod^{m}_{j=1} \left[ \frac{(D^{n,k}_{\lambda_{1}\lambda_{2}}f_{j}(t^{n})^{\prime \prime})^{2_{\gamma 1}-1}}{pt^{p-1}} \right]^{\delta^{1}_{j}} \cdot \left[ \frac{[(D^{n,k}_{\lambda_{1}\lambda_{2}}f_{j}(t^{n}))^{\prime}]^{2_{\gamma 2}-1}}{pt^{p-1}} \right]^{\delta^{2}_{j}} dt \right\}^{\frac{1}{\beta}}} \] with respect to the general integral operator \(I^{1}_{p}(z)\) and \[ \displaystyle{I^{4}_{p}(z)= \left\{\chi \int^{z}_{0} pt^{p-1} \cdot \prod^{m}_{j=1} \left[ \frac{(D^{\beta}_{\lambda}f_{j}(t^{n})^{\prime \prime})^{2_{\gamma 1}-1}}{pt^{p-1}} \right]^{\delta^{1}_{j}} \cdot \left[ \frac{[(D^{\beta}_{\lambda}f_{j}(t^{n}))^{\prime}]^{2_{\gamma 2}-1}}{pt^{p-1}} \right]^{\delta^{2}_{j}} dt \right\}^{\frac{1}{\chi}}} \] with respect to the general integral operator \(I^{2}_{p}(z)\). Further, they give sufficient conditions for the operator \(I^{3}_{p}(z)\) to be \(p\)-valent starlike, \(p\)-valent close-to-convex, \(p\)-valent uniformly close-to-convex and strongly starlike of order \(\tau\) (\(0< \tau \leq 1\) in \(U\).