On the nonnegativity of normal Hilbert coefficients of two ideals (Q357882)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
On the nonnegativity of normal Hilbert coefficients of two ideals
scientific article

    Statements

    On the nonnegativity of normal Hilbert coefficients of two ideals (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    14 August 2013
    0 references
    Let \((R, \mathfrak{m})\) be an analytically unramified local ring of dimension \(d \geq 1\). Let \(I\) be an \(\mathfrak{m}\)-primary ideal and \(\bar{I}\) the integral closure of \(I\). Then there exist integers \(\bar{e}_i(I)\) such that the length \[ \lambda (R/\bar{I}^{n+1}) = \displaystyle \sum_{ i=0} ^d (-1)^i \bar{e}_i(I) {n+d-i\choose d- i} \] [\textit{D. Rees}, Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 57, 1--7 (1961; Zbl 0115.26202); J. Lond. Math. Soc. 36, 24--28 (1961; Zbl 0115.26202)]. When \(R\) is Cohen-Macaulay, \textit{T. Marley} [Hilbert functions of ideals in Cohen-Macaulay rings, Ph. D. Thesis, Purdue University (1989)] proved that \(\bar{e}_1(I) \geq 0\) and \(\bar{e}_2(I) \geq 0\), and \textit{S. Itoh} proved that \(\bar{e}_3(I) \geq 0\) [J. Algebra 150, No.1, 101--117 (1992; Zbl 0756.13008)]. When \(R\) is an unmixed local ring, \textit{S. Goto, J. Hong} and \textit{M. Mandal} showed that \(\bar e_1(I)>0\) [Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 139, No. 7, 2399-2406 (2011; Zbl 1230.13020)] . In [Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 53, 568--575 (1957; Zbl 0080.02903)], \textit{P. B. Bhattacharya} studied pairs of \(\mathfrak{m}\)-primary ideals \(I\) and \(J\) in a Noetherian local ring of dimension \(d \geq 1\) and proved that for large values of \(r\) and \(s\), there exist integers \(e_{i,j}(I,J)\) such that \[ \lambda (R/{I}^{r}J^{s}) =\displaystyle \sum_{ i+j \leq d} (-1)^{d-(i+j)}{e}_{(i,j)}(I,J) {r+i-1\choose i}{s+j-1\choose j}. \] In that case, \textit{C. D'Gruz} and \textit{A. Guerrieri} [Lecture Notes in Pure and Applied Mathematics 244, 59--68 (2006; Zbl 1110.13015)] proved the nonnegativity of \({e}_{(i,j)}(I,J)\) for \(i+j \geq d-2\) when the ring is a Cohen-Macaulay local ring. Further, \textit{D. Rees} [J. Lond. Math. Soc., II. Ser. 24, 467-479 (1981; Zbl 0492.13012)] showed that, in an analytically unramified local ring, the Hilbert function \(\bar{H}_{I,J} (r,s) := \lambda (R/ \bar{I^r} \bar{J^s})\) is a polynomial \(\bar {P}_{(I,J)}(x,y) \in Q[x,y]\) of total degree \(d\) written as \[ \bar {P}_{(I,J)}(x,y)= \displaystyle \sum_{ i+j \leq d} (-1)^{d-(i+j)}{\bar{e}}_{(i,j)}(I,J) {x+i-1\choose i}{y+j-1\choose j} \] for \(r, s\gg 0\). In the paper under review, the authors prove that \(\bar{e}_{(i,j)}(I,J) = {e}_{(i,j)}(I,J)\) for \(i+j = d\) in an analytically unramified local ring of dimension \(d \geq 1\), which implies the non-negativity of \(\bar{e}_{(i,j)}(I,J)\) for \(i+j = d\) [\textit{C. Huneke} and \textit{I. Swanson}, Integral closure of ideals, rings, and modules. London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series 336. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (2006; Zbl 1117.13001)]. Furthermore, they prove that \(\bar{e}_{(i,j)}(I,J) \geq 0\) for \(i+j \geq d-3\) in a Cohen-Macaulay local ring. In the last section, they show that \(\bar{e}_{(i,j)}(I,J) \geq 0\) for \(i+j = d-1\) in an unmixed local ring.
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    analytically unramified local rings
    0 references
    integral closure of an ideal
    0 references
    \(\mathfrak m\)-primary ideals
    0 references
    normal Hilbert polynomial
    0 references
    mixed multiplicities
    0 references