Adjoint ideals and a correspondence between log canonicity and \(F\)-purity (Q365896)

From MaRDI portal

!

This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6207092
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    Adjoint ideals and a correspondence between log canonicity and \(F\)-purity
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6207092

      Statements

      Adjoint ideals and a correspondence between log canonicity and \(F\)-purity (English)
      0 references
      0 references
      9 September 2013
      0 references
      0 references
      test ideals
      0 references
      log canonical
      0 references
      \(F\)-pure
      0 references
      adjoint ideals
      0 references
      \(F\)-singularities are those defined by the action of Frobenius. One of the main open problems in the study of \(F\)-singularities is a conjectured relation between log canonical singularities (from the minimal model program) and \(F\)-pure singularities (which can be defined in the geometric setting by a local splitting of Frobenius). The author proves several interesting results motivated by this conjecture.NEWLINENEWLINEFirst, in Theorem 2.11, the author shows that the weak ordinarity conjecture implies that log canonical singularities are of dense \(F\)-pure type (see the work of \textit{M. Mustaţă} and \textit{V. Srinivas} [Nagoya Math. J. 204, 125--157 (2011; Zbl 1239.14011)]). Other results relating the log canonical and \(F\)-pure threshold are also obtained assuming the weak ordinarity conjecture.NEWLINENEWLINESecond, in Corollary 3.4, the author shows that the adjoint ideal restricts to a variant of the test ideal via reduction to characteristic \(p \gg 0\) (answering a question proposed earlier by the article under review's author in [Math. Z. 259, No. 2, 321--341 (2008; Zbl 1143.13007)].NEWLINENEWLINEFinally, in Theorem 4.1, building on the method of \textit{D. Hernández} in [``\(F\)-purity versus log canonicity for polynomials'', preprint, \url{arXiv:1112.2423}], he shows that certain log canonical pairs have dense \(F\)-pure type when the defining equations of the pair are sufficiently general.
      0 references

      Identifiers

      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references