Minimal surface area position of a convex body is not always an \(M\)-position (Q375683)
From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Minimal surface area position of a convex body is not always an \(M\)-position |
scientific article |
Statements
Minimal surface area position of a convex body is not always an \(M\)-position (English)
0 references
31 October 2013
0 references
Answering a question posed by A. Giannopoulos and V. Milman, the author shows that minimal surface area positions of convex bodies do not necessarily lead to \(M\)-positions. More precisely, it is proved that there exists an absolute constant \(c_0>0\) with the following property. For every \(n\in{\mathbb N}\), there exists a 1-unconditional convex body \(K\) of volume \(|K|=1\) in \({\mathbb R}^n\) which is in minimal surface area position (that is, has minimal surface area among its affine images of the same volume), but satisfies \[ |K+D_n|^{1/n}\geq c_0n^{1/8}, \] where \(D_n\) denotes the Euclidean unit ball. The proof uses various interesting devices, among them the curvature image of a star body and the inverse Blaschke-Santaló inequality.
0 references
\(M\)-position
0 references
minimal surface area position
0 references
1-unconditional bodies
0 references
isotropic constant
0 references