Chow motives versus noncommutative motives (Q380276)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Chow motives versus noncommutative motives
scientific article

    Statements

    Chow motives versus noncommutative motives (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    13 November 2013
    0 references
    Let \(\text{Chow}_{\mathbb{Q}}(k)= \text{Chow}_{\mathbb{Q}}\) be the \(\mathbb{Q}\)-linear, additive and symmetric monoidal category of Chow motives over a field \(k\) and let \(M: \text{SmProj}^{\text{op}}/k\to\text{Chow}_{\mathbb{Q}}\) be the contravariant functor, that associates to every smooth projective variety \(X\) its Chow motive \(M(X)\). Let \(\mathbb{Q}(1)\in\text{Chow}_{\mathbb{Q}}\) be the Tate motive. The functor \(F= (-)\otimes\mathbb{Q}(1)\) is an automorphism of the category \(\text{Chow}_{\mathbb{Q}}\). The orbit category \({\mathcal C}= \text{Chow}_{\mathbb{Q}}/F\) has the same objects of \(\text{Chow}_{\mathbb{Q}}\) and morphisms \[ \Hom_{{\mathcal C}}(M(X), M(Y))= \bigoplus_{j\in\mathbb{Z}} \Hom_{\text{Chow}_{\mathbb{Q}}}(M(X), M(Y)\otimes\mathbb{Q}(j)). \] Let Mot be the triangulated category of non-commutative motives over \(k\). Kontsevich's category KMM identifies with a thick triangulated category of Mot. The category \(KMM_{\mathbb{Q}}\) has a canonical \(\otimes\)-structure. By taking idempotent completion one gets a natural inclusion \(KMM^{\text{id}}_{\mathbb{Q}}\subset \text{Mot}^{\text{id}}_{\mathbb{Q}}\). In this paper the author following ideas of {Konsevitch} in [Mixed non-commutative motives. University of Miami (2010)], shows that there is a fully faithful, \(\mathbb{Q}\)-linear, additive and symmetric monoidal functor \(R: \text{Chow}_{\mathbb{Q}}\to KMM^{\text{id}}_{\mathbb{Q}}\) and proves a relationship between the finiteness conditons in \(\text{Chow}_{\mathbb{Q}}\) and in the non-commutative category. More precisely, if \(M(X)\) is Schur finite, resp. Kimura finite, in \(\text{Chow}_{\mathbb{Q}}\), then \(NC(X)\) has the same property in \(KMM^{\text{id}}_{\mathbb{Q}}\), where \(N\) is the functor \(\text{SmProj}^{\text{op}}\to KMM^{\text{id}}_{\mathbb{Q}}\). The converse holds for Schur finiteness. The author also proves that certain motivic zeta functions admit an intrinsic construction inside the category of non-commutative motives.
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    Chow motives
    0 references
    noncommutative motives
    0 references
    Kimura and Schur finiteness
    0 references
    motivic measures
    0 references
    motivic zeta functions
    0 references
    0 references