No label defined (Q3972363)

From MaRDI portal

!

This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 15717
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    No label defined
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 15717

      Statements

      0 references
      25 June 1992
      0 references
      \(p\)-adic Hodge cycles
      0 references
      abelian variety
      0 references
      Tate module
      0 references
      de Rham cohomology
      0 references
      Mumford-Tate group
      0 references
      \(p\)-adic Betti lattice
      0 references
      [For the entire collection see Zbl 0707.00010.] Let \(\overline\mathbb{Q}\) denote the algebraic closure of \(\mathbb{Q}\) in some fixed algebraic closure of \(\mathbb{Q}_ p\), say \(\overline\mathbb{Q}_ p\). Let \(A\) be an abelian variety over \(\overline\mathbb{Q}_ p\). According to the work of Fontaine and Messing, there is a canonical pairing between the Tate module \(T_ p(A_{\overline\mathbb{Q}_ p})\) and the de Rham cohomology \(H^ 1_{DR}(A)\) with values in a certain \(\overline\mathbb{Q}_ p\)-algebra \(\mathbb{B}_{DR}\). If \(A\) is defined over \(\overline\mathbb{Q}\), there is a natural \(\overline\mathbb{Q}\)-structure on \(H^ 1_{DR}\) and any embedding \(\gamma:\overline\mathbb{Q}\hookrightarrow\mathbb{C}\) gives a \(\mathbb{Z}\)- lattice \(H^ 1_ B(A_ \mathbb{C},\mathbb{Z})\) on \(T_ p(A_{\overline\mathbb{Q}_ p})\). By analogy with a conjecture of Grothendieck in the complex case, Fontaine asked whether the \(\overline\mathbb{Q}\)-transcendence degree of the values of this pairing restricted to these substructures is the dimension of the Mumford-Tate group. We disprove this, but show (under some mild hypothesis) that it is true for sufficiently general \(\gamma\). For \(A/\overline\mathbb{Q}_ p\) of dimension \(g\) with multiplicative reduction, we then construct a \(p\)-adic Betti lattice of another kind. Using Frobenius one constructs a pairing between this rank \(2g\) \(\mathbb{Z}\)- lattice \({\mathcal L}\) and \(H^ 1_{DR}\) with values in a Laurent polynomial ring \(\overline\mathbb{Q}_ p[t,t^{-1}]\), depending on the choice of a branch of \(\log_ p\). In the relative case \({\mathcal L}\) is horizontal and the formula giving the pairing is quite similar to the complex one (\(p\)-adic evaluation of the same power series, \(\log\mapsto\log_ p\), \(2i\pi\mapsto t)\). We then study the \(p\)-adic analogue of the Grothendieck conjecture in this context, and suggest the possibility of a purely \(p\)-adic definition of Hodge cycles. Recently all this was widely generalized in the construction of a \(\overline\mathbb{Q}\)-structure in the de Rham cohomology of any abelian variety or (conditionally) any projective variety with good reduction over \(\overline\mathbb{Q}_ p\), stable under correspondences and with horizontal behaviour in the relative situation.
      0 references

      Identifiers

      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references