No label defined (Q3972625)
From MaRDI portal
!
This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 15978
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| default for all languages | No label defined |
||
| English | No label defined |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 15978 |
Statements
25 June 1992
0 references
Lehmer conjecture for an elliptic curve
0 references
Néron-Tate height
0 references
0.9393638
0 references
0.9347018
0 references
0 references
0.9160831
0 references
0.9114847
0 references
0.9083246
0 references
0.90658873
0 references
[For the entire collection see Zbl 0711.00009.] The Lehmer conjecture for an elliptic curve \(E\), defined over a number field \(k\), states that the canonical Néron-Tate height \(h(Q)\) of an algebraic point \(Q\) of infinite order should be greater than \(constant\times d(Q)^{-1}\) (where \(d(Q):=[k(Q):k]\) is the degree of the field generated by \(Q\)). This diophantine inequality generalises naturally the classical Lehmer conjecture on the multiplicative group (infinite order is the analog of not being a root of unity). We improve known lower bounds in the case the \(j\)-invariant of the curve \(E\) is not integral to get \(h(Q)\geq cd^{-2}\log d(Q)^{-2}\), where \(c\) is an explicit constant depending on the curve. A close to best possible bound \(h(Q)\geq cd^{-1}\{\log d(Q)/\log\log d(Q)\}^{-3}\) is known for complex multiplication curves which of course have integral \(j\)-invariant [\textit{M. Laurent}, Théorie des nombres, Sémin. Delange-Pisot-Poitou, Paris 1981/82, Prog. Math. 38, 137-152 (1983; Zbl 0521.14010)]. When the curve is not CM but the \(j\)-invariant is integral, we cannot improve the general bound \(h(Q)\geq cd^{-3}\log d(Q)^{-2}\) of \textit{D. W. Masser} [Bull. Soc. Math. Fr. 117, No. 2, 247-265 (1989; Zbl 0723.14026)]. Like the last mentioned paper, we obtain the lower bound by actually giving a bound for the number of points of small height, but whereas Laurent and Masser use transcendance methods, we rely on the decomposition of \(h\) as a sum of local Néron heights, using techniques developed by the authors in a previous paper [Invent. Math. 93, No. 2, 419-450 (1988; Zbl 0657.14018)] and a lemma due to \textit{N. Elkies} on the average of Green functions [see the book by \textit{S. Lang}: ``Introduction to Arakelov theory'' (1988; Zbl 0667.14001), theorem 5.1, p. 150].
0 references