Feedback stabilization methods for the solution of nonlinear programming problems (Q398644)

From MaRDI portal





scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6330867
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    Feedback stabilization methods for the solution of nonlinear programming problems
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6330867

      Statements

      Feedback stabilization methods for the solution of nonlinear programming problems (English)
      0 references
      0 references
      15 August 2014
      0 references
      \noindent The goal of the paper is to show the construction of a well-defined dynamical system on the feasible set of a nonlinear programming problem (NLP) with the following properties:\newline P 1: The conditions of Nagumo's theorem, given on p. 27 of \textit{J.-P. Aubin} [Viability theory. Boston, MA etc.: Birkhäuser (1991; Zbl 0755.93003)] must be satisfied.\newline P 2: The vector field appearing in the right-hand side of the dynamical system is a locally Lipschitz vector field.\newline P 3: The equilibrium points of the dynamical system are exactly the points for which the necessary Karush-Kuhn-Tucker conditions of the NLP hold.\newline P 4: The objective function of the NLP is a (strict) Lyapunov function for the dynamical system.\newline P 5: The vector field appearing in the right-hand side of the dynamical system must be explicitly known.\newline P 6: The vector field appearing in the right-hand side of the dynamical system must have free parameters, which can be selected in an appropriate way so that the convergence properties of the corresponding numerical schemes to the global attractor of the dynamical system are optimal.\newline The author claims that the theory used for the construction of the algorithm is different from other existing algorithms, although other algorithms have much better characteristics than the algorithms proposed in this paper. So, no claim is made about the effectiveness of the proposed algorithms. Moreover, no claim is made about the generality of the results: the linear independence constraint qualification assumed in this work is a restrictive assumption. The paper provides some examples, which show the performance of the algorithms.
      0 references
      nonlinear programming
      0 references
      feedback stabilization
      0 references
      Lyapunov functions
      0 references
      nonlinear systems
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references

      Identifiers