A comparison of iterative methods to solve complex valued linear algebraic systems (Q403093)

From MaRDI portal





scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6335812
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    A comparison of iterative methods to solve complex valued linear algebraic systems
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6335812

      Statements

      A comparison of iterative methods to solve complex valued linear algebraic systems (English)
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      29 August 2014
      0 references
      This overview and analysis of various iterative methods to solve sparse complex linear equations includes both preconditioning and splitting methods as well as extensive and detailed tests and numerical experiments. In general, it is advisable to replace a sparse complex linear system \(Cz = h \in \mathbb C^n\) by a \(2n\) by \(2n\) real system such as \( \begin{bmatrix} A & -B\\B & A \end{bmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} x\\y \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} f\\g \end{pmatrix}\) or \( \begin{bmatrix} B & -A\\A & B \end{bmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} x\\-y \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} g\\f \end{pmatrix}\) where \(C = A + iB, \;z = x+iy\) and \(h = f+ig\) and all right hand entries in the last three equations are real, except for \(i = \sqrt{-1}\). The advice in the conclusions section should be heeded by anyone in need solving complex sparse linear systems.
      0 references
      0 references
      complex linear equation
      0 references
      complex symmetric system
      0 references
      preconditioning
      0 references
      splitting method
      0 references
      numerical test
      0 references
      sparse matrix
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references

      Identifiers

      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references