No label defined (Q4035849)

[For the entire collection see Zbl 0752.00059.] This interesting article contains only the following theorem: let \(\rho(r)\to\rho\), \(0<\rho<\infty\), be an arbitrary proximate order, \(h\) be a \(\rho\)-trigonometrically convex \((\rho\)-t.c.) \(2\pi\)-periodic function, \(g\) be an upper semi-continuous \(2\pi\)-periodic function (these conditions are necessary), \(g(\varphi)\leq h(\varphi)\), \(0\leq\varphi\leq 2\pi\), \(h\not\equiv g\). Let \(A(\rho(r))\) be the set of entire functions of order \(\rho\) and mean type with respect to \(\rho(r)\). The function \(f\in A(\rho(r))\) having \(h\) and \(g\) as its indicator and lower indicator respectively, exists if and only if the functions \(h\) and \(g\) are concordant. This means that either \(h\) is strictly \(\rho\)-t.c., or for each maximal interval of \(\rho\)-trigonometricity of the function \(h\) eight assertions are satisfied. These assertions include, e.g., the M. Cartwright's theorem and B. Levin's theorem about the completely regular growth of a holomorphic function with trigonometric indicator inside an angle.