Bumps on the road to here (from eternity) (Q406004)

Summary: In his recent book [From eternity to here: the quest for the ultimate theory of time. New York: Dutton Press (2010)] and in other more technical papers, \textit{S. Carroll} (partly in collaboration with Jennifer Chen) has put forward an intriguing new way to think about the origin of the Universe. His approach, in a nutshell, is to raise certain worries about a standard Boltzmannian picture of statistical mechanics, and to present certain commitments that he thinks we ought to hold -- commitments that the standard picture doesn't share. He then proposes a cosmological model -- one that purports to give us insight into what sort of process brought about the ``initial state'' of the universe -- that can uniquely accommodate those commitments. The conclusion of Carroll's argument is that statistical mechanical reasoning provides grounds for provisionally accepting that cosmological model. My goal in this paper is to reconstruct and critically assess this proposal. I argue that ``statistical cosmology'' requires a careful balance of philosophical intuitions and commitments against technical, scientific considerations; how much stock we ought to place in these intuitions and commitments should depend on where they lead us -- those that lead us astray scientifically might well be in need of philosophical re-examination.