No label defined (Q4242209)
From MaRDI portal
!
This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1285452
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| default for all languages | No label defined |
||
| English | No label defined |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1285452 |
Statements
10 May 1999
0 references
coding theory
0 references
perfect code
0 references
graph
0 references
distance
0 references
0.9831496
0 references
0.9027662
0 references
0 references
0.8901049
0 references
0.88616407
0 references
0.8830694
0 references
0.8829077
0 references
0.8808063
0 references
0.8761401
0 references
Let \(C\) be a perfect binary code with distance 3. In the graph \(G(C)\) of the minimum distances in \(C\), two vertices are defined to be adjacent if and only if their elementary codes lie at distance 3. Phelps and Le Van recently posed the question whether isomorphy of \(G(C_1)\) and \(G(C_2)\) implies that \(C_1\) and \(C_2\) are equivalent. A mapping \(f\: C_1 \to C_2\) is called a weak isometry provided that \(d(\alpha,\beta)=3\) if and only if \(d(f(\alpha),f(\beta))=3\). The positive answer to the above question follows from the following theorem. If two perfect binary \((n,3)\)-codes are weakly isometric then they are equivalent.
0 references