multinomineq (Q42491)

From MaRDI portal





Bayesian Inference for Multinomial Models with Inequality Constraints
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    multinomineq
    Bayesian Inference for Multinomial Models with Inequality Constraints

      Statements

      0 references
      0.2.5
      22 November 2022
      0 references
      0.2.1
      16 May 2019
      0 references
      0.2.3
      28 February 2022
      0 references
      0.2.4
      22 August 2022
      0 references
      0.2.6
      20 February 2024
      0 references
      0 references
      20 February 2024
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      Implements Gibbs sampling and Bayes factors for multinomial models with linear inequality constraints on the vector of probability parameters. As special cases, the model class includes models that predict a linear order of binomial probabilities (e.g., p[1] < p[2] < p[3] < .50) and mixture models assuming that the parameter vector p must be inside the convex hull of a finite number of predicted patterns (i.e., vertices). A formal definition of inequality-constrained multinomial models and the implemented computational methods is provided in: Heck, D.W., & Davis-Stober, C.P. (2019). Multinomial models with linear inequality constraints: Overview and improvements of computational methods for Bayesian inference. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 91, 70-87. <doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2019.03.004>. Inequality-constrained multinomial models have applications in the area of judgment and decision making to fit and test random utility models (Regenwetter, M., Dana, J., & Davis-Stober, C.P. (2011). Transitivity of preferences. Psychological Review, 118, 42–56, <doi:10.1037/a0021150>) or to perform outcome-based strategy classification to select the decision strategy that provides the best account for a vector of observed choice frequencies (Heck, D.W., Hilbig, B.E., & Moshagen, M. (2017). From information processing to decisions: Formalizing and comparing probabilistic choice models. Cognitive Psychology, 96, 26–40. <doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2017.05.003>).
      0 references

      Identifiers