Interpreting groups and fields in simple, finitary AECs (Q435188)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Interpreting groups and fields in simple, finitary AECs
scientific article

    Statements

    Interpreting groups and fields in simple, finitary AECs (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    11 July 2012
    0 references
    The paper under review contributes to geometric stability theory in abstract elementary classes (AECs). The main result is a generalisation of a theorem in (elementary first-order) stability theory due to \textit{E. Hrushovski} [Ann. Pure Appl. Logic 45, No. 2, 139--155 (1989; Zbl 0697.03023)], namely the geometric classification of almost orthogonal (non-orthogonal) regular types, as either coming from a regular action of an abelian group, the action of the affine linear group on \(\mathbb{A}^1(K)\) or else the action of \(\mathrm{PGL}_2(K)\) on \(\mathbb{P}^1(K)\), for \(K\) an algebraically closed field. Previously, Hrushovski's result was generalised to non-elementary contexts in work of \textit{T. Hyttinen} et al. [J. Math. Log. 5, No. 1, 1--47 (2005; Zbl 1082.03033)]. The present paper differs from this work in that it assumes much less homogeneity for the AEC \((\mathbb{K},\preccurlyeq_{\mathbb{K}})\) under consideration, pushing the context even further away from a framework where compactness holds. This gain in generality is levelled against strong hypotheses on the independence notion (associated to Lascar non-splitting) in \((\mathbb{K},\preccurlyeq_{\mathbb{K}})\). The authors work in a simple, superstable finitary AEC \((\mathbb{K},\preccurlyeq_{\mathbb{K}})\), with monster model \(\mathfrak{M}\). They first gather some facts about independence and regular (Lascar strong) types in this context. Given an unbounded Lascar strong type \(p\) over a small set \(A\) with set of realisations \textbf{P}, denote by \textbf{P}\(/E\) the geometry associated with the natural pregeometry on \textbf{P}. Consider the following setting: \textbf{Q} is an \(A\)-invariant subset of \(\mathfrak{M}\), and there is \(0<n<\omega\) such that \noindent (i) for any independent sequence \((a_1,\ldots,a_n)\) in \textbf{P} and any finite \(C\subseteq \mathbf Q\), one has \(\dim(a_1,\ldots,a_n/A)=\dim(a_1,\ldots,a_n/A\cup C)\), and \noindent (ii) there is an independent sequence \((a_1,\ldots,a_{n+1})\) in \textbf{P} and some finite subset \(C\) of \textbf{Q} such that one has the inequality \(\dim(a_1,\ldots,a_{n+1}/A)>\dim(a_1,\ldots,a_{n+1}/A\cup C)\). Let \textbf{G} be the group of `elementary permutations' of \textbf{P}\(/E\) over \textbf{Q}. The action of \textbf{G} is shown to be transitive on independent \(n\)-tuples (\(n\) being maximal with this property), and an element of \textbf{G} is determined by its restriction to any \(n+1\)-dimensional subset of \textbf{P}. It follows by results of Hyttinen et al. [loc. cit.] that \textbf{G} is interpretable in \(\mathfrak{M}\) (in a suitable sense) over a finite set of parameters. Due to the absence of a good theory of \(\mathfrak{M}^{\mathrm{eq}}\) in this framework, in order to prove their classification result, the authors need to strengthen (ii) to: \noindent (ii\('\)) There is an independent sequence \((a_1,\ldots,a_{n+1})\) in \textbf{P} and some finite subset \(C\) of \textbf{Q} such that \((a_1,\ldots,a_n)\) dominates \((a_1,\ldots,a_{n+1})\) over \(A\cup C\). Under these assumptions, the main result is proved: \(\mathfrak{M}\) interprets a group \(G\) which acts on \textbf{P}\(/E\). Furthermore, either \(\mathfrak{M}\) interprets a non-classical group (i.e., a non-abelian group carrying an \(\omega\)-homogeneous pregeometry -- the existence of such a group is an open problem), or \(n\in\{1,2,3\}\) and, if \(n=1\), \(G\) is abelian and acts regularly on \textbf{P}\(/E\), if \(n=2\), the action of \(G\) on \textbf{P}\(/E\) is isomorphic to the action of the affine linear group acting on \(\mathbb{A}^1(K)\), and if \(n=3\) it is isomorphic to the action of \(\mathrm{PGL}_2(K)\) on \(\mathbb{P}^1(K)\), where \(K\) an algebraically closed field. The paper ends with a discussion of examples, one being Pappian projective planes, thus connecting their theorem to a very classical coordinatisation result.
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    geometric stability theory
    0 references
    abstract elementary classes
    0 references
    0 references