Lowersemicontinuity of energy clusters (Q4354110)
From MaRDI portal
!
This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1060131
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| default for all languages | No label defined |
||
| English | Lowersemicontinuity of energy clusters |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1060131 |
Statements
Lowersemicontinuity of energy clusters (English)
0 references
26 February 1998
0 references
surface energies
0 references
lower semicontinuity
0 references
ellipticity
0 references
0 references
0.7492424
0 references
0 references
0.7241714
0 references
0.7176142
0 references
0.7129496
0 references
0.70920414
0 references
0.70054924
0 references
0.6908677
0 references
The paper deals with the existence of minimal energy configurations for clusters (i.e., partitions of a given domain in a finite number of regions) in the case when the density of the interfacial energy between the \(i\)-th region and the \(j\)-th region has the general form \(\varphi_{ij}(p)\), where \(p\) is the unit normal vector to the surface. Improving an example by \textit{L. Ambrosio} and \textit{A. Braides} [J. Math. Pures Appl. 69, No. 3, 307-333 (1990; Zbl 0676.49029)], the author shows the existence of an energy density satisfying the triangle inequality \[ \varphi_{ij}(p)\leq\varphi_{ik}(p)+\varphi_{kj}(p) \] such that \(p\mapsto\varphi(i,j,p/|p|)|p|\) is convex (both of these conditions are necessary for lower semicontinuity) and such that the associated energy on clusters is not lower semicontinuous, providing also a boundary value problem which has no solution. The final part of the paper contains an elegant proof, based on graph theory, of the fact that the triangle inequality and convexity are sufficient for lower semicontinuity if \(\varphi_{i,j}(p)=\theta(i,j)\psi(p)\) for suitable function \(\theta\), \(\psi\).
0 references