The finite model property for various fragments of linear logic (Q4382470)

From MaRDI portal

!

This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1130650
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    The finite model property for various fragments of linear logic
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1130650

      Statements

      The finite model property for various fragments of linear logic (English)
      0 references
      0 references
      8 October 1998
      0 references
      finite model property
      0 references
      completeness
      0 references
      decidability
      0 references
      fragments of propositional linear logic
      0 references
      finite phase models
      0 references
      phase semantics
      0 references
      This paper proposes an elegant approach to the decision problems for various fragments of propositional linear logic (LL), which makes use of phase semantics. Phase spaces are the analogue of boolean algebras for classical logic: a formula \(A\) is provable in LL iff it is satisfied by every phase model. Propositional classical logic (and similarly propositional intuitionistic logic) satisfies a ``finite model property'': a formula \(A\) is provable iff it is satisfied by every finite boolean model. This entails that propositional classical logic is decidable. The main idea of the paper is to apply this method (just substitute ``boolean model'' by ``phase model'') to show the decidability of various fragments of LL. The author proves the finite model property for multiplicative and additive LL (MALL) and for affine LL, that is LL with weakening (LLW). This gives a new (rather simple) and uniform proof of decidability for MALL and LLW. It is also shown that the finite phase semantics is not complete for multiplicative and exponential linear logic (MELL), for which the decision problem is still an open question.
      0 references

      Identifiers