Sine transform based preconditioners for elliptic problems (Q4383435)

From MaRDI portal

!

This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1138088
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    Sine transform based preconditioners for elliptic problems
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1138088

      Statements

      1 April 1998
      0 references
      preconditioned conjugate gradient method
      0 references
      sine transform
      0 references
      numerical examples
      0 references
      comparison of methods
      0 references
      LU-factorization
      0 references
      Laplace equation
      0 references
      preconditioning
      0 references
      condition number
      0 references
      Cholesky factorization
      0 references
      Sine transform based preconditioners for elliptic problems (English)
      0 references
      The paper deals with a preconditioning method for the system \(Ax=b\) where \(A\) is a symmetric and positive definite matrix of tridiagonal block form with diagonal blocks \(D_i\) and off-diagonal blocks \(A_i\). For a general square matrix \(Q\), the optimal sine transform approximation \(s(Q)\) to \(Q\) is defined. Then the preconditioner \(\widehat s(A)\) for the preconditioned conjugate gradient (PCG) method is constructed by a block-by-block way. It is demonstrated that \(\widehat s(A)\) coincides with a matrix \(G\) which has the same block form as \(A\). The respective blocks of \(G\), however, are \(s(D_i)\) and \(s(A_i)\). For two-dimensional domains, in this article the authors show that the cost for each PCG iteration is \(\mathcal O(n^2\log n)\) including the construction of \(\widehat s(A)\), and, for rectangular regions, the condition number for the preconditioned system \((\widehat s(A))^{-1}A\) is of order \(\mathcal O(1)\). Some extensions to irregular or three-dimensional domains are also given. The method is numerically tested and compared with the modified incomplete LU and the modified incomplete block Cholesky factorization. Though the results seem to be favourable for the proposed method, the reader might ask what they would be if irregular meshes, more general domains, and another operator (different from a perturbed Laplacian one) were considered.
      0 references

      Identifiers

      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references