A Counterexample to Completeness Properties for Indefinite St urm—Liouville Problems (Q4383974)
From MaRDI portal
!
This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1139455
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| default for all languages | No label defined |
||
| English | A Counterexample to Completeness Properties for Indefinite St urm—Liouville Problems |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1139455 |
Statements
A Counterexample to Completeness Properties for Indefinite St urm—Liouville Problems (English)
0 references
25 May 1998
0 references
indefinite Sturm-Liouville problems
0 references
turning points
0 references
0.901098608970642
0 references
0.8989804983139038
0 references
0.8409121632575989
0 references
The author considers indefinite Sturm-Liouville problems \[ -f''= \lambda wf\text{ on } (-1,1), \quad f(-1) =f(1) =0 \] where \(w\in L^1(-1,1)\) changes sign in \((-1,1)\). Different from the definite case \((w>0)\), the eigenfunctions of the indefinite problem need not form a Riesz basis of the Hilbert space \(L^2_{| w|} (-1,1)\). It is proved by \textit{P. Binding} and \textit{H. Volkmer} [SIAM Rev. 38, No. 1, 27-48 (1996; Zbl 0869.34020)] that this is true even when \(w\) has finitely many turning points. This paper confirms the theoretic result by constructing an explicit counterexample.
0 references