On the diophantine equation $n(n+1)...(n+k-1) = bx^l$ (Q4385577)

From MaRDI portal

!

This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Unfortunately, we do not yet have an article page for this item.

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1142770
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    On the diophantine equation $n(n+1)...(n+k-1) = bx^l$
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1142770

      Statements

      On the diophantine equation $n(n+1)...(n+k-1) = bx^l$ (English)
      0 references
      20 April 1998
      0 references
      exponential equation
      0 references
      product of consecutive positive integers
      0 references
      arithmetic progressions
      0 references
      0 references
      In 1975 \textit{P. Erdős} and \textit{J. L. Selfridge} [Ill. J. Math. 19, 292-301 (1975; Zbl 0295.10017)] proved that the product of consecutive positive integers is never a perfect power. Since then a number of similar problems have been investigated by Győry, Saradha, Shorey and Tijdeman (see [\textit{K. Győry}, Acta Arith. 80, 289-295 (1997; Zbl 0871.11022) and \textit{N. Saradha}, On perfect powers in products with terms from arithmetic progressions, Acta Arith. 82, 147-172 (1997)] and the references therein). Let \(P(x)\) be the greatest prime divisor of \(x\). In the present paper the author considers the title equation in positive integers \(n,k,b,x,\ell\) with \(k\geq 2\), \(\ell\geq 2\), \(P(b)\leq k\), and where \(b\) is \(\ell\)th power free. For given \(k\), this equation is solvable with \(P(x)\leq k\) and all such solutions can be determined. Hence \(P(x)>k\) is the more interesting case. The author provides a complete solution of the title equation under the latter assumption.
      0 references

      Identifiers

      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references