On an additive question (Q4407963)

From MaRDI portal

!

This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1944646
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    On an additive question
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1944646

      Statements

      28 January 2004
      0 references
      additive theory
      0 references
      inverse problem
      0 references
      complementing set
      0 references
      On an additive question (English)
      0 references
      For any two sets \(A\) and \(B\), denote \(C=A\oplus B\) if \(C=A+B\) and every \(c\in C\) has unique representation \(c=a+b\), where \(a\in A\) and \(b\in B\), and \(A, B\) are called a complementing pair. This article considers the case \(C={\mathbb Z}^k\), where \(k\) is an integer. For any finite set \(A\subseteq C\), the main theorem in this article gives an equivalent condition for the existence of a complementing pair of \(A\) in \(C\). Specifically it shows that a finite set \(F\) and an associated set \(G\subseteq F^{k+1}\) can be determined in proper time so that such a complementing pair exists if and only if there exists a map \(f: {\mathbb Z}^k\to F\) with \[ (f(P),f(P+e(1)),\cdots,f(P+e(k)))\in G, \] for all \(P\in{\mathbb Z}^k\), where \(e(i)\in{\mathbb Z}^k\) and has \(i\)th component 1 all others 0, and ``proper time'' means in time not exceeding a constant depending at most on \(k\) and \(N_1\cdots N_k\) with given positive integers \(N_1,\dots,N_k\). The theorem implies that in the case of \(C={\mathbb Z},\) for any given set \(A\) of finite diameter \(N\), there will be at most \(N\) \(\mathbb Z\)-complementing sets of \(A\). Further there is a bijection between the maps \(f\) and the complementing sets of \(A\). The article also gives an inductive (on \(k\)) result with regard to the determination of sets \(F\) and \(G\) so that the question can be reduced to the case of \(k=1\). However, reduction on \(k\) does not guarantee ``proper time'', hence the determination of the existence of a complementing set for a given set within proper time remains unresolved. Proofs will be given elsewhere. For the entire collection see [Zbl 0997.00018].
      0 references
      0 references

      Identifiers