No label defined (Q4416902)
From MaRDI portal
!
This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1959649
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| default for all languages | No label defined |
||
| English | No label defined |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1959649 |
Statements
5 August 2003
0 references
Adjusted \(R^2\) measures
0 references
Deviance
0 references
Sum-of-squares
0 references
Shrinkage
0 references
Degrees of freedom
0 references
Predictive power
0 references
Explained variation
0 references
0 references
0.86591613
0 references
0.86570615
0 references
0 references
0.86092305
0 references
0.85944176
0 references
0.85549366
0 references
The common \(R^2\) measure provides a useful means to quantify the degree to which variation in the dependent variable can be explained by the covariates in a linear regression model. Recently, there have been various attempts to apply the definition of the \(R^2\) measure to generalized linear models. This paper studies two different \(R^2\) measure definitions for the gamma regression model. These measures are related to deviance and sum-of-squares residuals. Depending on the sample size and the number of covariates fitted, so-called unadjusted \(R^2\) measures may be substantially inflated, and the use of adjusted \(R^2\) measures is then preferred. We study several known adjustments previously proposed for \(R^2\) measures in regression models and illustrate the effect on the two unadjusted \(R^2\) measures for the gamma regression model. Comparing the resulting measures with underlying population values, we find the best adjustment via simulation.
0 references