Stochastic programming models: Wait-and-see versus here-and-now (Q4428685)
From MaRDI portal
!
This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1984252
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| default for all languages | No label defined |
||
| English | Stochastic programming models: Wait-and-see versus here-and-now |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1984252 |
Statements
22 September 2003
0 references
stochastic programming
0 references
standard programming
0 references
portfolio selection
0 references
newsboy problem
0 references
0 references
0.8912711
0 references
0.8870626
0 references
0.8766099
0 references
0.8691393
0 references
0.86843574
0 references
0 references
Stochastic programming models: Wait-and-see versus here-and-now (English)
0 references
Practical problems of Stochastic Programming (SP) can be tackled by using a wait-and-see (w\&s) or a here-and-now (h\&n) strategy. The behavior of them is discussed in this paper through well-known problems as the newsboy, portfolio selection, expansion of a network pollution control, etc. The problems are presented and the corresponding SP Problems are discussed. The decision making derived from each strategy is analyzed. W\&s problems appear as a less complicated approach than \(h\&n\) because the integral and the \(min\) operators are exchangeable. Two theorems fix the measurability of the optimal value and the solution and an interchange criterion. The optimal conditions gave clues that sustain the effectiveness of the Progressive Hedging Algorithm [see \textit{R. T. Rockafellar} and \textit{R. J. B. Wets}, Math Oper. Res. 16, 119-147 (1991; Zbl 0729.90067)]. For the entire collection see [Zbl 0990.00072].
0 references