A Note on a Mountain Pass Characterization of Least Energy Solutions (Q4454023)

From MaRDI portal

!

This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2051992
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    A Note on a Mountain Pass Characterization of Least Energy Solutions
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2051992

      Statements

      A Note on a Mountain Pass Characterization of Least Energy Solutions (English)
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      7 March 2004
      0 references
      least energy solutions
      0 references
      mountain pass characterization
      0 references
      second order elliptic equation
      0 references
      variational methods
      0 references
      positive solutions
      0 references
      homoclinic solutions
      0 references
      This paper is a continuation of the study undertaken recently by the authors [Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 131, 2399--2408 (2003; Zbl 1094.35049)] for the nonlinear scalar field equations \[ -\Delta u=g(u),\qquad u(x)\in H^{1}( \mathbb R^N) ,\tag{1} \] in the case where \(N\geq2.\) Assuming now that \(N=1,\) under rather general conditions on the nonlinearity \(g,\) it is established that (a) Eq. (1) has a unique, up to translation, positive solution; (b) all nontrivial solutions of (1) are least energy solutions; (c) the natural functional, \[ I(u)=\frac{1}{2}\int_{\mathbb R^n}| \nabla u| ^{2}\,dx-\int_{\mathbb R^n}\left( \int_{0}^{u}g(\tau)\,d\tau\right) dx, \] corresponding to (1), has a mountain pass geometry. The conservation of total energy, which is a consequence of the fact that (1) is autonomous, is crucial for the proof of the main result. The authors concentrate their attention mainly on a mountain pass characterization of least energy solutions and not on the existence and uniqueness of solutions. For instance, they define a functional, \[ I(q)=\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}\frac{1}{2}| \dot{q}| ^{2}-V(q)\,dt, \] which has a mountain pass geometry and explain how it can be used for finding homoclinic solutions of a certain Hamiltonian system by exploiting variational methods. The authors also provide an example, based on the idea from singular Hamiltonian systems, showing that the mountain pass characterization of least energy solutions is not true for systems.
      0 references

      Identifiers

      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references