Constructivist and structuralist foundations: Bishop's and Lawvere's theories of sets (Q448334)

From MaRDI portal





scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6078321
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    Constructivist and structuralist foundations: Bishop's and Lawvere's theories of sets
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6078321

      Statements

      Constructivist and structuralist foundations: Bishop's and Lawvere's theories of sets (English)
      0 references
      0 references
      6 September 2012
      0 references
      0 references
      categories of sets
      0 references
      categorical logic
      0 references
      Bishop's informal set theory
      0 references
      Lawvere's elementary theory of the category of sets
      0 references
      constructive type theory
      0 references
      structuralist foundation for constructive mathematics
      0 references
      Comparing Bishop's informal set theory with Lawvere's elementary theory of the category of sets (ETCS), the author proposes a constructive and predicative version of ETCS whose standard model is based on the constructive type theory of Martin-Löf. The theory, CETCS, provides a structuralist foundation for constructive mathematics in the style of Bishop.NEWLINENEWLINEAs one may expect, CETCS is classically equivalent to ETCS plus the Axiom of Choice and the Principle of Excluded Middle. Also, the theory allows to ``reason using elements'' which greatly simplifies its potential application, avoiding most of the rather complex categorical notions.NEWLINENEWLINENevertheless, a purely categorical characterisation of categorical models for CETCS is possible and the author shows it. This characterisation requires to show that the category is locally Cartesian closed, among a few other properties. Since deciding whether a category is locally Cartesian closed apparently requires the use of the Axiom of Choice in the meta-theory, the author reduces this check to the simpler task of verifying the validity of a specific axiom of CETCS. This last result has an independent value from CETCS and may be useful in other contexts.
      0 references

      Identifiers

      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references