Accuracy, robustness and efficiency comparison in iterative computation of convection diffusion equation with boundary layers (Q4500702)

From MaRDI portal

!

This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1496595
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    Accuracy, robustness and efficiency comparison in iterative computation of convection diffusion equation with boundary layers
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1496595

      Statements

      0 references
      0 references
      18 April 2001
      0 references
      convection-diffusion equations
      0 references
      boundary layer
      0 references
      grid streching
      0 references
      multilevel preconditioner
      0 references
      multigrid method
      0 references
      finite difference schemes
      0 references
      Accuracy, robustness and efficiency comparison in iterative computation of convection diffusion equation with boundary layers (English)
      0 references
      Nine-point fourth order finite difference schemes, central difference schemes and upwind schemes are compared for solving two-dimensional convection-diffusion equations with boundary layers. A grid transformation technique maps the nonuniform grid to a uniform one, on which the difference schemes are applied. A multigrid method and multilevel preconditioning are used to solve the resulting sparse linear system. This article compares the relative advantages and disadvantages of these schemes, when a nonuniform discretization mesh is used to resolve the boundary layers. Also the relative robustness and efficiency of the classical multigrid method and the multilevel preconditioning technique is compared. This article is intended as an evaluation of these three finite difference methods for an accurate and efficient computation of convection-diffusion equations with boundary layers. As a result the authors claim that the most accurate results are obtained with the fourth order finite difference scheme, when the mesh is stretched properly and the BILUM preconditioning technique is used. However, if the solution is not smooth enough, this scheme exhibits problems and the two other methods can be more suitable.
      0 references

      Identifiers

      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references