Fractal modelling of turbulent combustion (Q4525874)

From MaRDI portal

!

This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1556285
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    Fractal modelling of turbulent combustion
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1556285

      Statements

      Fractal modelling of turbulent combustion (English)
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      27 March 2003
      0 references
      fractal model
      0 references
      turbulent combustion
      0 references
      dissipative reacting turbulent structures
      0 references
      subgrid reaction rate
      0 references
      heat source term
      0 references
      local flamelet surface area
      0 references
      laminar flamelet approach
      0 references
      diffusion flame
      0 references
      From the conclusions: A new type of turbulence fractal model (FM) has been developed and proposed in a previous paper [the authors, ibid. 3, No. 4, 637-655 (1999; Zbl 0962.76036)] that (at the moment) assumes an isotropic turbulent viscosity. This model can be applied to RANS and LES codes. In the present paper FM has been extended to the reactive case to study turbulent combustion. FM estimates the volume fraction \(\gamma^*\) occupied by dissipative reacting turbulent structures in each cell, assumed to control the subgrid reaction rate and the heat source term. The model also estimates the local flamelet surface area, giving the possibility to use it in conjunction with laminar flamelet approach. The model can simulate combustion irrelevant of its mode (i.e. diffusive, premixed and/or hybrid) because the local physical interpretation of these macroscopically different flames is the same. In the present paper we have tested the reactive IFM with a diffusion flame: the results obtained so far are in good agreement with the experimental measurements, and are better than those obtained with a \(k-\varepsilon\) approach.
      0 references

      Identifiers