New identities of differential operators from orbital integrals on πΊπΏ(π,π) (Q4536076)
From MaRDI portal
!
This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1756767
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| default for all languages | No label defined |
||
| English | New identities of differential operators from orbital integrals on πΊπΏ(π,π) |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1756767 |
Statements
New identities of differential operators from orbital integrals on πΊπΏ(π,π) (English)
0 references
17 June 2002
0 references
metaplectic groups
0 references
trace formula
0 references
orbital integral
0 references
differential operators
0 references
metaplectic coverings
0 references
0 references
0.785753071308136
0 references
0.7848787307739258
0 references
0.7542815804481506
0 references
0.7462586164474487
0 references
This paper is devoted to the proof of one formula (Theorem 1) between certain differential operators on \(\text{GL}(r,\mathbb C)\). Let \(M\) be a Levi subgroup of \(\text{GL}(r,\mathbb C)\); then for any smooth compactly supported function \(f\) and \(g\in \text{GL}(r,\mathbb C)\) let \(J_M(g, f)\) denote Arthur's weighted orbital integral. Then there exist differential operators \(\partial^L_M(\gamma,z)\) (with \(z\) in the centre of the universal enveloping algebra of \(\text{Lie}(L\otimes\mathbb C)\)) so that, for \(z\) now in the centre of the universal enveloping algebra, we have a formula of the form \[ J_M(\gamma, zf)= \sum \partial^L_M(\gamma, z_L) J_L(\gamma, f). \] These serve to characterize the nature of the orbital integrals. The main theorem of the author is a formula relating the \(\partial^G_M(\gamma^n, z)\), whenever \(\gamma^n\) is regular, to a sum of \(\partial^G_M(\gamma\eta, z')\) where the \(\eta\) are elements of order \(n\). Here \(z\mapsto z'\) is a map which compensates for the transformation of the ``spectrum''. Although the statement is quite short it is both in content and proof subtle. The proof consists of a delicate study of the differential operators involved. The significance of this theorem is that it should provide the basis, at Archimedean places, of the generalized Shimura correspondence for metaplectic coverings, especially those with \(n> 2\).
0 references