A polynomial algorithm for testing diagnosability of discrete-event systems (Q4540472)

From MaRDI portal

!

This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1769721
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    A polynomial algorithm for testing diagnosability of discrete-event systems
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1769721

      Statements

      A polynomial algorithm for testing diagnosability of discrete-event systems (English)
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      21 July 2002
      0 references
      complexity
      0 references
      diagnosability
      0 references
      discrete event system
      0 references
      failure diagnosis
      0 references
      transitive closure
      0 references
      An algorithm for testing the diagnosability of a system presented via a (nondeterministic) finite state automaton \(G=( X, \Sigma , \delta , x_{0})\) (\(X\) is the set of states , \(\Sigma\) is the set of event labels, \(\delta \subseteq X \times \Sigma \times X\) is the transition relation, \(x_{0}\) is the initial state) is proposed under the suppositions that the language generated by \(G\) is live, there does not exist any cycle consisting of unobservable events only, the failures are presented via the failure assignment function \(\psi : \Sigma \to \{ F \} \cup \{ \emptyset \}\) (\(F\) is a finite set of failure types) and any failure event is an unobservable one. The proposed algorithm is based on the design of a machine \(G_{0}\) being a special type of the transitive closure of \(G\), and on the analysis of cycles of the Cartesian product of \(G_{0}\) with itself (with inputs of both copies joined together). Reviewer's comments: 1. The formula in Definition 1 is incorrect, since it is of the form \((\forall\dots)\dots (\forall\dots) \Rightarrow\dots\;\). Since Definition 1 is the basic one for the reviewed paper this blunder makes it difficult to understand the problem that is solved. 2. To make the comparison of the complexity of the proposed algorithm with the results of M. Sampath (published about eight years ago), it would not be out of place to outline briefly the problem he solved and the results he obtained.
      0 references

      Identifiers

      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references