No label defined (Q4547892)

In the realm of ``intuitionistic fuzzy sets'', as introduced by \textit{K. T. Atanassov} [Fuzzy sets Syst. 20, 87-96 (1986; Zbl 0631.03040)], the author studies a concept called \(\gamma\)-openness and based upon \(\gamma\)-continuity of functions. Intuitionistic fuzzy subsets \(A\) of a given set \(X\) form a generalization of fuzzy sets just by assuming 2 nonnegative measures coming with each point \(x\): a measure of membership and a measure of nonmembership of \(x\) to \(A\), whose sum is required to be in \([0,1]\). Some suitable imitations of the usual set-theoretical operations are declared in this realm, and using this, the concept of ``intuitionistic fuzzy topological spaces'' is declared. Then a property called intuitionistic fuzzy \(\gamma\)-openness is defined for subsets, which is weaker than intuitionistic fuzzy openness, intuitionistic fuzzy semi-openness, intuitionistic fuzzy pre-openness, but stronger than intuitionistic fuzzy \(\beta\)-openness. Consequently intuitionistic fuzzy \(\gamma\)-continuity is derived as a property of functions between intuitionistic fuzzy topological spaces. In general, compositions of intuitionistic fuzzy \(\gamma\)-continuous functions need not be intuitionistic fuzzy \(\gamma\)-continuous, so a few conditions are proved for such compositions being intuitionistic fuzzy \(\gamma\)-continuous. The notions ``intuitionistic fuzzy \(\gamma\)-closedness'' and ``intuitionistic fuzzy extreme disconnectedness'' are defined in an appropriate manner and are used as conditions to describe when a function is intuitionistically fuzzy \(\gamma\)-continuous or when a composition of such functions is. It should be mentioned that the paper is full of misprints -- which must not necessarily be caused by the author, but is really a little inconvenient.