Estimating Survival Curves Under Proportional Hazards Model with Covariate Measurement Errors (Q4702178)
From MaRDI portal
!
This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1368031
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| default for all languages | No label defined |
||
| English | Estimating Survival Curves Under Proportional Hazards Model with Covariate Measurement Errors |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1368031 |
Statements
Estimating Survival Curves Under Proportional Hazards Model with Covariate Measurement Errors (English)
0 references
23 November 1999
0 references
confidence bands
0 references
Cox proportional hazards model
0 references
errors-in-variables
0 references
hazard functions
0 references
measurement error model
0 references
partial likelihood
0 references
0.8508157134056091
0 references
0.8465518355369568
0 references
The authors propose a corrected cumulative baseline hazard estimator for the measurement error Cox model that is simple and easy to use. For a general additive measurement error model where the magnitude (standard deviation) of the measurement error \(\sigma^{2}\) is not assumed to go to zero, if a \(\beta\) estimator is consistent with an asymptotic normal distribution then the proposed estimator is also consistent and converges to a Gaussian process. One such consistent \(\beta\) estimator is the corrected maximum partial likelihood estimator (MPLE) proposed by \textit{T. Nakamura} [Biometrics 48, 829-838 (1992)]. The authors also derive corresponding modified estimators for the hazard functions and the survival functions of individuals with particular covariate values. Another purpose of this paper is to derive the confidence bands for both the cumulative hazard and survival functions when measurement error occurs, using a Monte Carlo technique developed by \textit{D.Y. Lin}, \textit{T.R. Fleming} and \textit{L.J. Wei} [Biometrika 81, 73-81 (1994)]. Some preliminary simulations performed by the authors indicate that the corrected confidence band indeed improves the naive one, even when \(\sigma^{2}\) is not that small.
0 references