Congruence Subgroups of PSL(2, Z) of Genus Less than or Equal to 24 (Q4811528)

From MaRDI portal

!

This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2096772
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    Congruence Subgroups of PSL(2, Z) of Genus Less than or Equal to 24
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2096772

      Statements

      Congruence Subgroups of PSL(2, Z) of Genus Less than or Equal to 24 (English)
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      6 September 2004
      0 references
      congruence subgroups of given genus
      0 references
      MAGMA
      0 references
      modular group
      0 references
      The article under review reports on recent work in which the authors ``have computed a complete list of congruence groups up to genus 24''. Since the full tables are too extensive to be included in the paper the authors provide only ``tables containing a full list of the congruence groups up to genus 3''. The full tables are available online at \url{http://www.uncg.edu/mat/faculty/pauli/congruence/}. The authors' calculations are based upon two important inequalities -- that of Cox and Parry relating the genus of a congruence subgroup to its level and that of Zograf and Kim and Sarnak relating the genus to the index. This interesting paper has its genesis in a deep fact: there exist only finitely many congruence subgroups in \(\text{SL}(2,\mathbb{Z})\) of fixed genus. This theorem has resulted from extensive work by several mathematicians (most notably D. McQuillan, J. B. Dennin jun., J. Thompson and D. Cox/W. R. Parry) during the period 1965--1984, work inspired by the conjecture of Hans Rademacher for the case of genus 0: there exist only a finite number of congruence subgroups of genus 0. This was ultimately proved by \textit{J. B. Dennin jun.} [Ill. J. Math. 16, 502--518 (1972; Zbl 0255.10029)], who settled the case of general genus as well [Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 51, 282--288 (1975; Zbl 0313.10022)]. Further proofs were given by \textit{J. G. Thompson} [Proc. Symp. Pure Math. 37, 533--555 (1980; Zbl 0448.20044)] and \textit{D. A. Cox} and \textit{W. R. Parry} [J. Reine Angew. Math. 351, 66--112 (1984; Zbl 0531.10028)].
      0 references

      Identifiers

      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references