The ergodic Hilbert transform in the Cesaro- sense for invertible Lamperti operators (Q4935761)
From MaRDI portal
!
This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1396424
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| default for all languages | No label defined |
||
| English | The ergodic Hilbert transform in the Cesaro- sense for invertible Lamperti operators |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1396424 |
Statements
The ergodic Hilbert transform in the Cesaro- sense for invertible Lamperti operators (English)
0 references
22 August 2001
0 references
\(\sigma\)-finite measure
0 references
Lamperti operator
0 references
Cesàro-\(\alpha\)-convergence
0 references
ergodic Hilbert transform
0 references
0.94728875
0 references
0 references
0.9117377
0 references
0 references
0.89953876
0 references
0.8995125
0 references
0.8966564
0 references
0.8937172
0 references
Let \((X,{\mathcal F},\mu)\) is a \(\sigma\)-finite measure space, a linear operator \(T: L_p(\mu)\to L_p(\mu)\) is a Lamperti operator if it maps functions with disjoint supports to functions with disjoint supports. The authors consider Cesàro-\(\alpha\)-convergence for \(\alpha\in (-1,0)\) of the ergodic Hilbert transform associated with an invertible Lamperti-operator \(T\). Specifically they prove that if \(p\in({1\over 1+\alpha}, \infty)\) and \[ \sup_{n\geq 0} \Biggl\|{1\over 2n+ 1} \sum^n_{k=-n}|T|^k_{1+ \alpha}\Biggr\|_{p(1+ \alpha)}< \infty, \] then the limits \[ \lim_{n\to\infty} {1\over A^{1+ \alpha}_n} \sum^n_{k=0} A^\alpha_{n- k}T^k f\quad\text{and}\quad \lim_{n\to\infty} {1\over A^\alpha_n} \sum^{n+1}_{k=1} A^\alpha_{n+ 1-k} \Biggl({T^kf- T^{-k}f\over k}\Biggr), \] \((f\in L_p(\mu))\), exist a.e. and in the strong operator topology. Here \(A^\alpha_0:=1\) and \(A^\alpha_n:= (\alpha+ 1)\cdots(\alpha+ n)/n!\), \(n\geq 1\), are the Cesàro-\(\alpha\)-numbers, and \(|T|\) denotes the linear modulus of \(T\). Moreover, it is shown that the assertion is no longer true in the limit case \(p= {1\over 1+\alpha}\).
0 references