Some criteria for univalence of analytic functions involving generalized fractional calculus operators (Q4941486)

From MaRDI portal

!

This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1412976
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    Some criteria for univalence of analytic functions involving generalized fractional calculus operators
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1412976

      Statements

      12 March 2000
      0 references
      univalent
      0 references
      starlike and convex functions
      0 references
      generalized fractional integrals and derivatives
      0 references
      Gauss and generalized hypergeometric functions
      0 references
      Meijer's \(G\)-functions and Fox's \(H\)-functions
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      Some criteria for univalence of analytic functions involving generalized fractional calculus operators (English)
      0 references
      Many papers in the theory of univalent functions are devoted to linear integral or integro-differential operators which map the class \({\mathcal S}\) (of normalized analytic and univalent functions in the open unit disk \(U\)) and its subclasses into themselves. Here we propose sufficient conditions that guarantee such mappings in the case of the generalized fractional integrals and derivatives, encompassing all the linear integro-differential operators already used in papers on univalent functions. These operators are defined by means of single integrals (differintegrals) involving Meijer's \(G\)-functions (or, more generally, Fox's \(H\)-functions) as kernels, but also represent \(m\)-tuple compositions (\(m>1\)) of classical Erdélyi-Kober operators [\textit{V. Kiryakova}, Generalized fractional calculus and applications (1994; Zbl 0882.26003)]. In particular, the hypergeometric operators of Saigo [see, e.g., \textit{H. M. Srivastava, M. Saigo} and \textit{S. Owa}, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 131, 412-420 (1988; Zbl 0628.30014)] and Hohlov follow as special cases when \(m=2\). Thus, our results are direct generalization of the Hohlov's criteria for convolution operators preserving univalent functions [\textit{Yu. Hohlov}, Pliska, Stud. Math. Bulg. 10, 87-92 (1989; Zbl 0829.30007)].
      0 references

      Identifiers