No label defined (Q4944056)

From MaRDI portal

!

This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1417304
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    No label defined
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1417304

      Statements

      0 references
      12 March 2001
      0 references
      subanalytic sets by Polish methods
      0 references
      Pfaffian sets
      0 references
      durvey
      0 references
      sub-Pfaffian sets
      0 references
      Lemma A and lemma B are two popular code names for the fundamental lemmas proved by \textit{Z. Denkowska}, \textit{S. Łojasiewicz}, and \textit{J. Stasica} in [Bull. Acad. Pol. Sci., Sér. Sci. Math. 27, 529-536 (1979; Zbl 0435.32006) and ibid., 537-539 (1979; Zbl 0457.32003)] and largely used to prove properties of subanalytic sets by Łojasiewicz's semi-analytic methods. The lemmas are about simplifying as much as possible the semi-analytic object we project to get our subanalytic set. Pfaffian sets, introduced by \textit{R. Moussu} and \textit{C. Roche} [Invent. Math. 105, No. 2, 431-441 (1991; Zbl 0769.58050) and Ann. Inst. Fourier, 42, No. 1-2, 393-420 (1992; Zbl 0759.32005)] following an idea of Hovanski, are, roughly speaking, ``good'' solutions of analytic differential equations and are more general than semi-analytic sets, while keeping many of their properties (C. Roche, J. P. Lion). Sub-Pfaffian sets are their proper analytic images. The present work is a nice survey on the subject. Analogues of Lemma A and B are given for sub-Pfaffian sets. Their proofs are mainly due to the author. Good reading and a useful survey.
      0 references

      Identifiers

      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references