The complexity of ODD<sub><i>n</i></sub><sup><i>A</i></sup> (Q4953205)
From MaRDI portal
!
This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1444037
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| default for all languages | No label defined |
||
| English | The complexity of ODD<sub><i>n</i></sub><sup><i>A</i></sup> |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1444037 |
Statements
The complexity of ODD<sub><i>n</i></sub><sup><i>A</i></sup> (English)
0 references
22 June 2000
0 references
bounded query reduction
0 references
query hierarchy
0 references
frequency computation
0 references
recursively enumerable set
0 references
semirecursive set
0 references
jump
0 references
0.8835662603378296
0 references
0.7773849964141846
0 references
0.7773596048355103
0 references
The authors consider oracle Turing machine computations where the complexity of the reduction is measured by the number of oracle queries asked for any fixed input. For an introduction to the corresponding area of bounded queries in recursion theory see the survey by \textit{W.~Gasarch} and \textit{F.~Stephan} [in: S. B. Cooper et al. (eds.), Models and computability. Invited papers of the Logic Colloquium '97. Lond. Math. Soc. Lect. Note Ser. 259, 117-156 (1999; Zbl 0944.03031)] and the textbook by \textit{W.~Gasarch} and \textit{G. A. Martin}, [Bounded queries in recursion theory (Birkhäuser, Boston) (1999; Zbl 0936.03038)]. For natural numbers \(n\geq 1\) and \(m\geq 2\) and for a set \(A\) (sets are always understood as sets of natural numbers), let \(\text{MODm}_n^A\) denote the set that contains exactly the (appropriately encoded) \(n\)-tuples \((x_1, \ldots, x_n)\) such that the number of indices \(k\) with \(x_k\) in \(A\) is not a multiple of \(m\). The set \(\text{ MOD2}_n^A\) is also called \(\text{ ODD}_n^A\), i.e., any \(n\)-tuple is in \(\text{ ODD}_n^A\) if and only if an odd number of its components is in \(A\). Main results of the paper are the following. First fix natural numbers \(n\) and~\(m\) as above and assume that \(A\) is a nonrecursive semirecursive set or is a jump . Then in the oracle Turing machine model where the queries have to be asked in parallel, the set \(\text{ ODD}_n^A\) can be decided with \(n\) queries to \(A\) but not with \(n-1\) queries. For the set \(\text{ MODm}_n^A\) the corresponding bound on the number of parallel queries is \(\lceil n/m \rceil + \lfloor n/m \rfloor\). For both sets,similar tight bounds can be derived in the sequential query model. Second, assume that \(A\) is not recursive but is semirecursive or recursively enumerable. Then in the sequential as well as in the parallel query model, for any natural number \(n\) strictly more sets can be decided with \(n+1\) queries to the oracle \(A\) than just with \(n\) queries, i.e., in both computation models we obtain a non-collapsing hierarchy with respect to the constant that bounds the number of queries.
0 references