On the vanishing of Hochster's \(\theta\) invariant (Q503335)

From MaRDI portal





scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    On the vanishing of Hochster's \(\theta\) invariant
    scientific article

      Statements

      On the vanishing of Hochster's \(\theta\) invariant (English)
      0 references
      0 references
      12 January 2017
      0 references
      In [Mosc. Math. J. 12, No. 2, 237--259 (2012; Zbl 1269.32016)] \textit{R.-O. Buchweitz} and \textit{D. van Straten} proved that the Hochster theta pairing associated to a complex isolated hypersurface singularity of even dimension vanishes. Their argument involves a reinterpretation of the Hochster theta pairing in terms of the topological \(K\)-theory of the link of the singularity. In the paper under review, the author aims to prove analogues of several results of Buchweitz-van Straten in positive characteristic. One of the main results (Corollary 7.16) implies the vanishing of the Hochster theta pairing associated to a large family of isolated hypersurface singularities of even dimension, settling a conjecture of H. Dao in a large number of cases. In Section 2, the author provides background on Buchweitz-van Straten's work and discusses a purely algebraic analogue of the Milnor fibration which exists in the positive characteristic setting. Section 3 contains a discussion of Sherman's ``star pairing'' in algebraic \(K\)-theory; this section contains a proof of (a weakened form of) a conjecture of Sherman which may be of independent interest. In Section 4, the results of section 3 are applied to give a reinterpretation of Hochster's theta pairing in terms of standard operations in algebraic \(K\)-theory. In Section 5, the aforementioned \(K\)-theoretic formula for Hochster's theta pairing is related to the ``specialization map'' in algebraic \(K\)-theory with finite coefficients. Section 6 gives some technical background on Bott-inverted algebraic \(K\)-theory with finite coefficients, and Section 7 contains the proof of the vanishing statement discussed above.
      0 references
      matrix factorization
      0 references
      hypersurface
      0 references
      theta invariant
      0 references
      0 references

      Identifiers