On automatic subsets of the Gaussian integers (Q505037)

From MaRDI portal





scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    On automatic subsets of the Gaussian integers
    scientific article

      Statements

      On automatic subsets of the Gaussian integers (English)
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      18 January 2017
      0 references
      \textit{A. Cobham} [Math. Syst. Theory 6, 164--192 (1972; Zbl 0253.02029)] introduced the notion of what is now called a \(k\)-automatic sequence. Such a sequence \((a_n)_{n \geq 0}\) is computed as follows: on input \(n\) expressed in base-\(k\), a finite automaton processes the digits, moving from state to state, until the input is completely read. Then, a function is applied to the last state reached to get \(a_n\). A set is called \(k\)-automatic if its characteristic sequence is \(k\)-automatic. \textit{J.-P. Allouche} et al. [Fractals 3, No. 4, 663--677 (1995; Zbl 0879.11010)] generalized this notion to, among other things, the Gaussian integers. In this paper, this idea is taken further. Using a mix of combinatorial and topological ideas, the authors prove that the set \(\{ a^n \, : \, n \geq 0 \}\) is not \(b\)-automatic if \(a, b \in \mathbb{Z}[i]\) are multiplicatively independent. A corollary answers a question from the paper of Allouche et al.~mentioned previously. The authors also prove that the set \(\mathbb{Z}\) is \(b\)-automatic if and only if \(b^j \in \mathbb{N}\) for some \(j \geq 1\).
      0 references
      automatic sequence
      0 references
      Gaussian integer
      0 references
      multiplicatively independent
      0 references
      Cobham's theorem
      0 references
      numeration system
      0 references

      Identifiers

      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references