Rainbow matchings and rainbow connectedness (Q510322)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Rainbow matchings and rainbow connectedness
scientific article

    Statements

    Rainbow matchings and rainbow connectedness (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    17 February 2017
    0 references
    Summary: \textit{R. Aharoni} and \textit{E. Berger} [Electron. J. Comb. 16, No. 1, Research Paper R119, 9 p. (2009; Zbl 1186.05118)] conjectured that every collection of \(n\) matchings of size \(n+1\) in a bipartite graph contains a rainbow matching of size \(n\). This conjecture is related to several old conjectures of \textit{R. A. Brualdi} and \textit{H. J. Ryser} [Combinatorial matrix theory. Cambridge etc.: Cambridge University Press. (1991; Zbl 0746.05002)], and \textit{S. K. Stein} [Pac. J. Math. 59, No. 2, 567--575 (1975; Zbl 0302.05015)] about transversals in Latin squares. There have been many recent partial results about the Aharoni-Berger Conjecture. The conjecture is known to hold when the matchings are much larger than \(n+1\). The best bound is currently due to \textit{R. Aharoni} et al. [``Representation of large matchings in bipartite graphs'', Preprint, \url{arXiv:1601.00943}] who proved the conjecture when the matchings are of size at least \(3n/2+1\). When the matchings are all edge-disjoint and perfect, the best result follows from a theorem of \textit{R. HÀggkvist} and \textit{A. Johansson} [Comb. Probab. Comput. 17, No. 4, 519--536 (2008; Zbl 1152.05019)] which implies the conjecture when the matchings have size at least \(n+o(n)\). In this paper we show that the conjecture is true when the matchings have size \(n+o(n)\) and are all edge-disjoint (but not necessarily perfect). We also give an alternative argument to prove the conjecture when the matchings have size at least \(\phi n+o(n)\) where \(\phi\approx 1.618\) is the Golden Ratio. Our proofs involve studying connectedness in coloured, directed graphs. The notion of connectedness that we introduce is new, and perhaps of independent interest.
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    matchings
    0 references
    connectedness
    0 references
    Latin squares
    0 references
    transversals
    0 references
    0 references