Effect algebras are not adequate models for quantum mechanics (Q535625)

From MaRDI portal

!

This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5887850
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    Effect algebras are not adequate models for quantum mechanics
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5887850

      Statements

      Effect algebras are not adequate models for quantum mechanics (English)
      0 references
      13 May 2011
      0 references
      The author proves the following facts: If an effect algebra admits an order-determining set of states (= probability measures), then it is a sub-effect algebra of \([0,1]^X\) for some set~\(X\) (thus the effect algebra is representable by fuzzy sets). If an effect algebra \(E\) admits at least one state, it admits hidden variables in the sense that there is a state-preserving morphism of \(E\) to some MV-algebra. These results indicate that effect algebras are not appropriate models of quantum mechanical systems. As an alternative, the author suggested sequential effect algebras in [\textit{S. Gudder} and \textit{R. Greechie}, Rep. Math. Phys. 49, No. 1, 87--111 (2002; Zbl 1023.81001)]. These structures, equipped with an additional operation, the \textit{sequential product}, and with a modified definition of a dispersion-free state, admit to overcome the above inadequacies. It is shown that a sequential effect algebra admits an order-determining set of dispersion-free states iff it is a sub-effect algebra of \([0,1]^X\).
      0 references
      0 references
      effect algebra
      0 references
      sequential product
      0 references
      quantum mechanics
      0 references
      hidden variable
      0 references
      state
      0 references
      probability measure
      0 references
      dispersion-free state
      0 references
      0 references

      Identifiers