Factoring matrices with a tree-structured sparsity pattern (Q551257)

From MaRDI portal

!

This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5924521
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    Factoring matrices with a tree-structured sparsity pattern
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5924521

      Statements

      Factoring matrices with a tree-structured sparsity pattern (English)
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      15 July 2011
      0 references
      The paper deals with factoring matrices whose sparsity pattern is a tree with maximal degree \(d_{\max}\). At first, the conventional sparse LU-factorization with partial pivoting and an effective column ordering is analyzed. The basic idea is to eliminate a leaf in each step that results in a variant of the minimum degree ordering algorithm. It is proven that this process requires \(\mathcal{O}(d_{\max}n)\) arithmetic operations and generates the same fill. At second, it is shown that the work and fill can be reduced to \(\mathcal{O}(n)\) using a more sophisticated ordering strategy called \textit{sibling-dominant pivoting}. In this algorithm, the column ordering depends on the numerical values of the matrix, not only on the structure of its graph. Furthermore, this ordering is built dynamically as the algorithm progresses, not as a preprocessing step. It is also proven that the growing factor in both algorithms is \(d_{\max}+1\) that is much smaller bound than the \(2^{n-1}\) bound for the general LU-factorization with partial pivoting. The numerical experiments demonstrate the theoretical results on academic problems given by almost-complete regular trees. The paper is well-written, interesting and instructive. The results have consequences whose significance may transcend the class of tree-structured matrices. First, the results show that there are classes of matrices on which a specific type of the ordering leads to the better efficiency. Second, they show that dynamic but cheap-to-compute local column reordering can dramatically reduce fill and work.
      0 references
      0 references
      sibling-dominant pivoting
      0 references
      tree-structured matrices
      0 references
      minimum degree ordering
      0 references
      sparse matrices
      0 references
      sparse LU-factorization
      0 references
      algorithm
      0 references
      column ordering
      0 references
      numerical experiments
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references

      Identifiers

      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references