Lower bounds for multidimensional zero sums (Q558239)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Lower bounds for multidimensional zero sums
scientific article

    Statements

    Lower bounds for multidimensional zero sums (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    5 July 2005
    0 references
    Let \(f(n,d)\) denote the least integer such that for any choice of \(f(n,d)\) elements in \({\mathbb Z}_n^d\) contains a subset of size \(n\) whose sum is zero. \textit{H. Harborth} [J. Reine Angew. Math. 262/263, 356--360 (1973; Zbl 0268.05008)] showed that \((n-1)2^d+1\leq f(n,d)\leq (n-1)n^d+1\). \textit{N. Alon} and \textit{M. Dubiner} [Combinatorica 15, 301--309 (1995; Zbl 0838.11020)] improved the upper bound to \(c_d n\). In this nice paper, the author improves the lower bound to \(1.125^{\lfloor d/3\rfloor}(n-1)2^d+1\) for all \(d\geq 3\) and odd \(n\geq 3\). The proof is based on an example of nine vectors in \({\mathbb Z}_3^2\), first used by Harborth to show that \(f(3,3)\geq 19\), which are now treated as vectors in \({\mathbb Z}_n^3\). The author proves a lemma showing that if \(n\geq 3\) is odd, and if any \(n\) vectors from Harborth's set add to \(0\in {\mathbb Z}_n^3\), then one necessarily needs to take the same vector \(n\) times. The proof of this statement is elementary but intricate, and the author's result follows easily from the above lemma. A few immediate corollaries are also presented.
    0 references
    0 references
    zero sums modulo n
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references