On the degree of approximation of continuous functions (Q558256)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
On the degree of approximation of continuous functions
scientific article

    Statements

    On the degree of approximation of continuous functions (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    5 July 2005
    0 references
    A sequence \(c=(c_n)\) of non-negative numbers, tending to zero, is said to be of rest bounded variation (\(c\in \text{RBVS}\)) if there exists a constant \(K\) such that for every integer \(m\), \[ \sum_{n=m}^\infty| c_n-c_{n+1}| \leq Kc_m. \] A sequence \(c=(c_n)\) of non-negative numbers is said to be of head bounded variation (\(c\in \text{HBVS}\)) if there exists a constant \(K\) such that for every integer \(m\), \[ \sum_{n=0}^{m-1}| c_n-c_{n+1}| \leq Kc_m. \] These notions clearly (strictly) extend the usual notions of monotone sequences. The author already used this weakening of the monotony condition to extend miscellaneous results (see for instance [\textit{L. Leindler}, Anal. Math. 27, 279--285 (2001; Zbl 1002.42002) and Anal. Math. 28, No. 4, 279--286 (2002; Zbl 1026.42007)]). Here the author is interested in the generalization of four theorems of \textit{P. Chandra} [Acta Math. Hung. 52, No. 3/4, 199--205 (1988; Zbl 0704.42004); ibid. 62, No.~1, 21--23 (1993; Zbl 0794.42002)] by replacing a hypothesis of monotony by the previous weaker type. Roughly speaking, this deals with the majorization of \(\| T_n(f)-f\| _\infty\), where \(f\) is a \(2\pi\)-periodic continuous function and \(T_n(f)=\sum_{k=0}^na_{n,k}S_n(f)\), with \(S_n(f)\) being the \(n^{\text{th}}\) Fourier-partial sum and where \(A=(a_{n,k})\) is a lower triangular infinite matrix of real numbers. The hypothesis of quasi-monotony concerns the rows of \(A\). We point out a minor mistake (rather a misprint) in the proof of Lemma 3. In (3.6), the \({1\over2}\) has to be replaced by \({\tau+1\over2}\). Then it is easy to conclude, since the RBVS hypothesis easily implies that \(\tau a_{n,\tau}=O(A_{n,\tau})\), that (3.3) (and then the Lemma) remains true.
    0 references
    continuous functions
    0 references
    degree of approximation
    0 references
    special sequences
    0 references
    Nörlund matrix
    0 references
    Riesz matrix
    0 references
    rest bounded variation
    0 references
    head bounded variation
    0 references

    Identifiers