On the relations between \(M(r)\) and the coefficients of a power series. (Q565649)
From MaRDI portal
| This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: On the relations between M(r) and the coefficients of a power series. |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2549890
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| default for all languages | No label defined |
||
| English | On the relations between \(M(r)\) and the coefficients of a power series. |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2549890 |
Statements
On the relations between \(M(r)\) and the coefficients of a power series. (English)
0 references
1932
0 references
Es sei \[ f(z) = a_0 + a_1z + \dots + a_n z^n + \dots \] eine Potenzreihe vom Konvergenzradius 1. Dann besteht zwischen den Wachstumsordnungen von \(M(r) = \max \limits _{|z|=r} |f(z)|\) und von \(|a_n|\) nach \(F\). \textit{Beuermann} (1931; F. d. M. \(57_{\text I}\), 353) der Zusammenhang: Ist \[ \overline {\lim }_{r\to 1-0} \frac {\log \log M(r)}{\log (1-r)^{-1}} = \mu \,. \quad \overline {\lim }_{n\to \infty } \frac {\log \log |a_n|}{\log n} = \sigma \quad (0< \sigma < 1) \,. \] so ist \[ \mu = \frac {\sigma }{1-\sigma }. \] Verf. gibt nun die entsprechende Beziehung für die Wachstumstypen: Ist \[ \overline {\lim }_{r\to 1-0} \frac {\log M(r)}{(1-r)^{-\mu }} = \alpha \,. \quad \overline {\lim }_{n\to \infty } \frac {\log |a_n|}{n^{\sigma }} = \beta \quad (\mu > 0. \; 0 < \sigma < 1; \; \alpha, \beta \; \text{endlich und} \neq 0) \,. \] so gilt \[ \mu = \frac {\sigma }{1-\sigma } \,. \quad \alpha = \beta ^{\frac {1}{1-\sigma }} (1- \sigma ) \sigma ^{\frac {\sigma }{1-\sigma }}. \] Weiter wird gezeigt: Sind \[ \overline {\lim }_{r\to 1-0} \frac {\log M(r)}{(1-r)^{-1}} = \kappa \,. \quad \overline {\lim }_{n\to \infty } \frac {\log |a_n|}{\log n} = \lambda \] beide endlich, so ist \(\lambda \leq \kappa \leq \lambda +1\); existiert \(\lim \limits _{n \to \infty } \frac {\log |a_n|}{\log n} = \lambda \), so gilt genauer \(\lambda + \frac {1}{2} \leq \kappa \leq \lambda + 1\).
0 references