Abstract prime number theorems (Q5830722)
From MaRDI portal
!
This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3091938
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| default for all languages | No label defined |
||
| English | Abstract prime number theorems |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3091938 |
Statements
Abstract prime number theorems (English)
0 references
1954
0 references
abstract prime number theorems
0 references
The paper gives a proof of a single abstract theorem which as particular cases contains the prime number theorem, the theorem for primes in arithmetic progressions and the prime ideal theorem. The problem which the paper deals with is: Let \(G\) be a free abelian group on a countable number of generators \(g_i\), \(i=1.2, \ldots\), and consider a homomorphism \(N\) of \(G\) into the positive rationals such that the images of the \(g_i, N g_i\), and therefore of course the images \(Nw\) of all integral words \(w\) of \(G\), are all integral. Let further \(G'\) be a subgroup of \(G\) with finite index \(h=[G: G']\), and \(H\) a generic coset of \(G/G'\). Treated is: what can than be deduced about the distribution, relative to \(N\), of the generators of \(G\) in the cosets of \( G/G'\) if one has information about the distribution of the integral words of \(G\) in these cosets. More precisely: Assumed that \[ B_{H}=\sum_{\substack{W \leq X \\ W \in H}} 1 = c_H x+O\left(x^{\theta}\right), \quad 0 \le \theta<1,\ c_H \ge 0 \] it is to prove that for each \(H\) we have \[ \pi_H(x)=\sum_{\substack{Ng \le x \\ g\in H}} 1=\frac{d_H x}{\log x}+o\left(\frac{x}{\log x}\right) \] where the \(c_H\) and \(d_H\) are constants depending on \(H\). The proof is following the recent developments in the prime number theory, and depends upon a generalized A. Selberg identity. The classical case that the \(c_H\) are all equal is implicitly contained (under weaker assumptions) in a paper by \textit{A. Beurling} [Acta Math. 68, 255--291 (1937; Zbl 0017.29604)] but his proof is of course not elementary.
0 references