Comparison of several iterative techniques in the solution of symmetric banded equations on a two-pipe Cyber 205 (Q583844)
From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Comparison of several iterative techniques in the solution of symmetric banded equations on a two-pipe Cyber 205 |
scientific article |
Statements
Comparison of several iterative techniques in the solution of symmetric banded equations on a two-pipe Cyber 205 (English)
0 references
1989
0 references
The numerical solution of partial differential equations (five model problems are described) is often led to the solution of a matrix equation. The effectiveness of several iterative techniques for solving these matrix equations are compared. The techniques are: the strongly implicit procedure of \textit{H. L. Stone} [SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 5, 530-558 (1968; Zbl 0197.133)]; the incomplete Cholesky conjugate-gradient method, including its vectorized and also a polynomial variant and the modified form of \textit{I. Gustafsson} [BIT 18, 142-156 (1978; Zbl 0386.65006)]; a diagonally scaled conjugate-gradient method and the polynomial preconditioned conjugate-gradient method of \textit{Y. Saad} [SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comput. 6, 865-881 (1985; Zbl 0601.65019)]. The comparisons are made on a vector machine. Results of the tests are presented in two tables (timing, iteration parameters, iteration counts and the megaflop rate for the iteration loop of each algorithm).
0 references
symmetric banded equations
0 references
two-pipe Cyber 205
0 references
comparison of iterative methods
0 references
numerical examples
0 references
model problems
0 references
matrix equation
0 references
incomplete Cholesky conjugate-gradient method
0 references
polynomial preconditioned conjugate- gradient method
0 references
timing
0 references
iteration parameters
0 references
iteration counts
0 references
0 references
0 references
0 references
0 references
0 references