Solving the generalized nonlinear Schrödinger equation via quartic spline approximation (Q5929928)

From MaRDI portal





scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1587134
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    Solving the generalized nonlinear Schrödinger equation via quartic spline approximation
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1587134

      Statements

      Solving the generalized nonlinear Schrödinger equation via quartic spline approximation (English)
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      24 February 2002
      0 references
      energy conservation
      0 references
      numerical examples
      0 references
      generalized nonlinear Schrödinger equation
      0 references
      semidiscretization
      0 references
      quartic spline collocations
      0 references
      Neumann boundary conditions
      0 references
      long-time solitary solutions
      0 references
      stability
      0 references
      soliton
      0 references
      The authors study a new method to compute solutions of the generalized nonlinear Schrödinger equation NEWLINE\[NEWLINEi{\partial u\over\partial t}+ {\partial^2u\over\partial x^2}+ f(|u|^2)u= 0,\quad -\infty< x<\infty,\quad t\geq t_0NEWLINE\]NEWLINE together with an initial condition for \(t= t_0\). Here \(i\) is the complex unit and \(f\) is a sufficiently smooth function for which \(f(0)= 0\).NEWLINENEWLINENEWLINEThe proposed method is based on a semidiscretization in space where quartic spline collocations are used to deal with the space singularities. Two methods are actually discussed, distinguished only by the approximation strategies for the Neumann boundary conditions. This method allows to compute long-time solitary solutions. The paper contains a careful analysis of the continuous and discrete conservation properties as well as the stability of the method.NEWLINENEWLINENEWLINETwo numerical tests are included, a single soliton case and a collision of two solitons case. Both methods work well and there is no significant difference in the numerical results.
      0 references

      Identifiers

      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references