The polyhedral Hodge number \(h^{2,1}\) and vanishing of obstructions (Q5932149)

From MaRDI portal

!

This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1595299
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    The polyhedral Hodge number \(h^{2,1}\) and vanishing of obstructions
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1595299

      Statements

      The polyhedral Hodge number \(h^{2,1}\) and vanishing of obstructions (English)
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      6 November 2001
      0 references
      Hodge numbers of projective toric varieties
      0 references
      deformation theory
      0 references
      toric Gorenstein singularities
      0 references
      The authors first give an alternative description of some of the polyhedral Hodge spaces introduced by \textit{M. Brion} [Tohoku Math. J. (2) 49, 1-32 (1997; Zbl 0881.52008)]. For a polytope \(\Delta\) defined over a subfield \(K\subset \mathbb R\), instead of starting directly from its normal fan as Brion does, they consider the cone over \(\Delta\) in \(K^{n+1}\) and define invariants \(D^k(\Delta)\) to be the cohomology groups arising from the cohomological system obtained by associating to each face of the cone its linear span. It turns out that for \(k>1\), the vector space \(D^k(\Delta)\) equals Brion's Hodge space \(H^{k,1}(\Delta)\). NEWLINENEWLINENEWLINEBy analyzing the spectral sequence relating the D-invariants of a polytope to those of its faces, the authors obtain an explicit set of equations describing \(D^2(\Delta)\) as a \(K\)-vector subspace of a certain larger vector space under the assumption that \(D^1\) and \(D^2\) vanish for every \(3\)-dimensional face of \(\Delta\). With this description they can prove the main result, namely vanishing of \(D^2\) for a certain class of polytopes whose \(3\)-faces are all pyramids. NEWLINENEWLINENEWLINEFor a lattice polytope, this vanishing result has an interpretation in the context of deformation theory. As the authors explain, there is a close relation between the space \(D^k(\Delta)\) and (after extension of scalars to complex numbers) the cotangent cohomology module \(T^k(X_{\text{cone}(\Delta)})\) describing the deformations of the toric Gorenstein singularity \(X_{\text{cone}(\Delta)}\) associated to the cone over the polytope \(\Delta\). However, in general the modules \(T^k\) depend on the lattice structure, whereas the D-invariants only depend on the polytope up to projective equivalence.NEWLINENEWLINENEWLINENevertheless the authors can give sufficient conditions on the lattice polytope ensuring that the modules \(T^k\) are in fact determined by its D-invariants. These conditions in particular imply vanishing of \(T^2\) for the corresponding class of toric Gorenstein singularities.
      0 references

      Identifiers

      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references