Closed geodesics and periods of automorphic forms (Q5938990)
From MaRDI portal
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1624860
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Closed geodesics and periods of automorphic forms |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1624860 |
Statements
Closed geodesics and periods of automorphic forms (English)
0 references
23 October 2002
0 references
Let \(\gamma\) be a prime closed geodesic on a compact hyperbolic surface of genus \(g\) uniformized by \(\Gamma< \text{PSL} (2,\mathbb{R})\), and \(\ell(\gamma)\) be its length, while \([\gamma]\) is its homology class \(H_1(\mathbb{H}/ \Gamma,\mathbb{Z})\). Further, let \(\pi(T,\alpha):= \#\{\gamma: l(\gamma)\leq T\), \([\gamma]= \alpha\}\). From the paper: ``G. Shimura introduced a period of a weight \(2m\) automorphic form \(f\) over a closed geodesic \(\gamma\), which we denote by \(r_m(f,\gamma)\). Zelditch showed that \(f\) has an ``asymptotic period'' \(\varepsilon(f)\) over a fixed homology class \(\alpha\). More precisely, writing \({\mathcal C}(T,\alpha)= \{\gamma: l(\gamma)\leq T\), \([\gamma]= \alpha\}\), \[ \lim_{T\to\infty} \frac{1}{\pi(T,\alpha)} \sum_{\gamma\in{\mathcal C}(T,\alpha)} r_m(f,\gamma)= \varepsilon(f), \tag{*} \] and \(\varepsilon(f)\) is independent of the choice of \(\alpha\). In this note we show that one cannot do better than averaging in this result, in the sense that the closed geodesics for which \(r_m(f,\gamma)\) is close to \(\varepsilon(f)\) have density zero in the set \(\{\gamma: [\gamma]= \alpha\}\). More precisely, we prove Theorem 1 below. For a weight \(2m\) automorphic form \(f\), let \(T(f)\) denote the closed subgroup of \(\mathbb{C}\) generated by the periods \(r_m(f,\gamma)\). As we see, \(T(f)\) spans \(\mathbb{C}\). Theorem 1. Let \(f\) be a nonzero automorphic form of weight \(2m\), \(m>1\). Then, for any \(\eta\in T(f)\) and \(\delta>0\), we have \[ \#\{\gamma: l(\gamma)\leq T,\;[\gamma]= \alpha,\;|r_m(f,\gamma)-\eta|\leq \delta\}\sim C\frac{e^T} {T^{{\mathfrak g}+2}}, \] where \(C>0\) is a constant independent of \(\alpha\) and \(\eta\). The most important special cases of this result are when \(T(f)\) is a lattice or when \(T(f)= \mathbb{C}\). In these cases we can make the slightly more precise statements below. In each case \(\beta_f: \mathbb{R}^{2{\mathfrak g}+2}\to \mathbb{R}\) is a certain ``thermodynamic'' function (depending only on \(f\)). Special cases. (1) If \(T(f)\) is a lattice in \(\mathbb{C}\) then, for any \(\eta\in T(f)\), we have \[ \#\{\gamma: l(\gamma)\leq T,\;[\gamma]= \alpha,\;r_m(f,\gamma)= \eta\}\sim \frac{|\mathbb{C}/T(f)|} {(2\pi)^{{\mathfrak g}+1} \sqrt{\det \nabla^2\beta_f(0)}} \frac{e^T} {T^{{\mathfrak g}+2}}, \] where \(|\mathbb{C}/ T(f)|\) denotes the area of a fundamental domain for \(T(f)\). (2) If \(T(f)= \mathbb{C}\) then, for any \(\eta\in \mathbb{C}\) and \(\delta>0\), we have \[ \#\{\gamma: l(\gamma)\leq T,\;[\gamma]=\alpha,\;|r_m(f,\gamma)-\eta|\leq \delta\}\sim \frac{\pi\delta^2} {(2\pi)^{{\mathfrak g}+1} \sqrt{\det\nabla^2 \beta_f(0)}} \frac{e^T} {T^{{\mathfrak g}+2}}. \] Corollary. For any \(\delta>0\), we have \[ \lim_{T\to\infty} \frac{1}{\pi(T,\alpha)} \#\{\gamma: l(\gamma)\leq T,\;[\gamma]= \alpha,\;|r_m(f,\gamma)- \varepsilon(f)|\leq \delta\}=0, \] i.e., the closed geodesics with period close to \(\varepsilon(f)\) have zero density in \(\{\gamma: [\gamma]= \alpha\}\). Remark. The restriction to a fixed homology class \(\alpha\) in (*) is crucial, even though the result is independent of \(\alpha\). Without this restriction, the averages vanish''.
0 references
periods of automorphic forms
0 references
closed geodesic
0 references
compact hyperbolic surface
0 references
0 references