Tensor products of AC\(_*\) charges and AC Radon measures are not always AC\(_*\) charges (Q5945932)

From MaRDI portal

!

This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use the normal view instead:

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1657943
Language Label Description Also known as
default for all languages
No label defined
    English
    Tensor products of AC\(_*\) charges and AC Radon measures are not always AC\(_*\) charges
    scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1657943

      Statements

      Tensor products of AC\(_*\) charges and AC Radon measures are not always AC\(_*\) charges (English)
      0 references
      0 references
      1 September 2002
      0 references
      Let \(\mu\) be an absolutely continuous Radon measure (with respect to the Lebesgue measure) in \(\mathbb{R}^n\), and let \(F\) be a charge in \(\mathbb{R}^m\). Given a bounded BV set \(B\subset \mathbb{R}^{m+n}\), let \(B^y= \{x\in \mathbb{R}^m: (x,y)\in B\}\), and \((F\otimes\mu)(B)= \int_{\mathbb{R}^n} F(B^y) d\mu(y)\). In this paper, the author gives a counterexample and shows that the tensor product \(F\otimes \mu\) may not be \(\text{AC}_*\) when \(F\) is \(\text{AC}_*\). A function \(G\) defined on \(m\)-dimensional BV sets is an \(m\)-dimensional charge if it is additive and continuous. Here the continuity is in terms of the Lebesgue measure, the perimeter and boundedness of a set.
      0 references
      charges
      0 references
      absolute continuity
      0 references
      BV sets
      0 references

      Identifiers

      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references
      0 references